• AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      84
      ·
      2 days ago

      If the gold is in an accepted standard form, such as krugerrands, you just need to find a precious metals dealer. If it’s just a pile of gold, then there’s a lot of hassle. I imagine ingots of the sort national gold reserves hold would be somewhere in between.

      Shifting a large quantity of gold may require a non-optional explanation of its provenance, with “I woke up and it was just there” or “a genie gave it to me after I did an online quiz” not being adequate, and an inadequate explanation resulting in its forfeiture if not more serious legal hassles. With a large pile of gold and no good explanation, you may be reduced to smurfing small pieces of it to different dealers, moving around a lot and avoiding the attention that such a pile would inevitably draw.

      • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Same would be required for 50M in cash not to mention Taxes.

        Btw cash is 50M gold is ~90M

        (And yes the “M” dose mean Monopoly money)

      • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        a large pile of gold

        That depends as well. Gold in specimen and nugget form can be worth considerably more than its value by weight and there’s plenty out there chasing these. These are not hard to move at all.

        But yeah, there can be difficulties trading it and it’s generally subject to taxes. Quite often you need to be licenced as at least a fossicker if you’re selling unrefined gold as a prospector.

        That’s without the pain in the arse process of separating it from impurities.

      • Mac@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        You don’t think you’ll be investogated for a massive gold transaction?

    • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’d choose gold. AFAIK most all money laundering rules deal with cash.

      Even if a geine were to give you 500 tons of cash or gold, some governments may have a problem with that and choose to redistribute it.

      Choosing gold makes the value much more liquid in my opinion.

      Not to mention that gold doesn’t rot (unlike USD). In today’s economy gold is probably more value-dense (as in, a pound of gold is worth more than a pound of hundered-dollar bills).

      Currencies also come and go but gold stays. If you’re thinking long-term, gold is the vastly better choice.

      • BlueFootedPetey@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        If that works for you, fine. Im sticking with cash. The government doesnt know I have it, they wont know to look for it. And it wont start rotting in my lifetime.

    • Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      You don’t sell the gold. You take 10x loans of gold’s worth and use it as collateral. Like banks and billionaires do. Well maybe 100x…

    • mbp@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      you can visit my local pawn shop, they give cash for gold

      70m in gold pls

      • BlueFootedPetey@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        O, very little would actually get deposited. But all my groceries and eating out and booze and lots of video games and hobbie shit will just get paid for in cash.