That is a testable claim. I just had it calculate the force of gravity between 2 objects and it was wrong by virtue of rounding incorrectly. That’s like highschool level math.
Chatgpt, as made available by the first search result for “chatgpt.” I chose this approach to match your claim you chose to repeat without verification.
I am not going to cross shop stochastic regressions with an English LUT in order to find one that works better for math just to appease your suspiciously wheel ladened goal post.
That is a testable claim. I just had it calculate the force of gravity between 2 objects and it was wrong by virtue of rounding incorrectly. That’s like highschool level math.
what model did you use? you should use pro with thinking for math
Why should we have to pay extra for a computer to do maths correctly? That is basic functionality of a computer.
Chatgpt, as made available by the first search result for “chatgpt.” I chose this approach to match your claim you chose to repeat without verification.
I am not going to cross shop stochastic regressions with an English LUT in order to find one that works better for math just to appease your suspiciously wheel ladened goal post.
ok. but the free models are dumber than pro version. so chatgpt isn’t defined by its base model.
idc if you buy chatgpt sub or not. im just asking tech questions here