im personally excited for it.

  • one_old_coder@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    You would rather ask an extremely unreliable piece of crap that accidentally destroys software engineering as a whole rather than find it yourself or read a book?

    Note that I am NOT against every technology. Every new piece of software brought something useful in the past. LLMs is the only one that has only negative parts. LLMs only solves the laziness problem, and it does it wrong most of the time.

        • steam@programming.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          i never said i like reading tho. i just want the concept or idea of a philosophy not the whole thing. like pop science. but i do pop philosophy.

          • unmagical@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            Whether or not you said you like reading isn’t really applicable. That you find books complicated and want a computer to dumb it down for you to the extent that you maybe can’t read a book anymore is indicative of the mental acuity you are capable of bringing to a conversation or task.

            Critical thinking is an exercise that one must keep up with, regardless of interest, if one is to be able to maintain effectiveness of it. Supplanting one’s own capabilities with a regression model will cause one’s abilities to atrophy and further a dependence on that algorithm regardless of its own incremental improvements.

            Books are not inherently complicated. They make them for kids. The fact you find them thus is an indicator of your own lack of ability.