• Deme@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Yes, and my response to what Mickey said was that why would we think that we’re in the cave looking at shadows? Why should I complicate my view of the world with the added baggage of metaphysical idealism when materialism works just fine to explain everything I see? Sure our perception of the world is limited to our senses and measurement techniques, but the scientific framework we’ve built onto that base appears very consistent and functional with its predictive power. It’s definitely not omniscience, but it works.

    I only brought up the Cogito argument to point out that Mickey is incorrect in saying that no certain knowledge exists.

    • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 minutes ago

      I think one of the points Mickey would make is you can’t entirely trust the scientific framework because it’s still coming from our flawed senses. Even if everything adds up, it could still be a lie. Solipsism and all that.

      I don’t think anyone is talking about metaphysical idealism, but conceptual things shouldn’t be written off because they are inconvenient. Numbers aren’t physical, but I doubt you’d say they don’t exist and therefore should be ignored, unless you’re the most extreme materialist.