• keimevo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Lemmy isn’t social media? Given that it is mostly a federated reddit clone, I would argue it is. Probably even more social than reddit considering that reddit has now more bots than people, unlike Lemmy (at least for now), and I think that a platform full of bots talking among themselves is not really “social”.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It’s only a r***it clone because the largest instances are at best reactionaries who market themselves as “progressives.” And before anyone gets offended, consider how quickly most users are quick to ally with known Zionazis (🐐) before actual leftists.

    • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      I disagree. It’s missing everything that makes social media, social media.

      Its anonymous. No self promotion. No actual socializing. No controlling body, and rarely even media. No monetization.

      Reddit was a link aggregator. They kind of socialized it with adding media uploads, and some people try and use it that way, but it really doesn’t meet the criteria either.

      Just like a bbs and Usenet were conversational, and in some ways a bit social, neither were “social media”. And Lemmy isn’t either.

      This term comes from companies pushing to monetize and unannonymize people. Facebook, or back in the day certain parts of AOL.

      Lemmy and reddit are link aggregating forums. We call them forums!