when@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 3 days ago[Ethics] Why do people condemn Zoophilia on the basis of other animal's inability to consent but those same people kill animals without asking for their consent? Why such inconsistency?message-squaremessage-square259fedilinkarrow-up1168arrow-down137file-text
arrow-up1131arrow-down1message-square[Ethics] Why do people condemn Zoophilia on the basis of other animal's inability to consent but those same people kill animals without asking for their consent? Why such inconsistency?when@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 3 days agomessage-square259fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSmeagol666@crazypeople.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·1 day ago“It’s called ‘inter-species erotica’, Fuck-o.”
minus-squarewhen@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-21 day agoThe question is on social acceptance of killing innocent animals while condemning zoophila. How come murder of innocent accepted but rape is considered a sin? Should we not come to an ideal conclusion and stop both?
minus-square__hetz@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoThey weren’t replying seriously. It’s a reference to the film “Clerks II.”
“It’s called ‘inter-species erotica’, Fuck-o.”
Kelly can be a guy’s name too! Hooooo
The question is on social acceptance of killing innocent animals while condemning zoophila. How come murder of innocent accepted but rape is considered a sin? Should we not come to an ideal conclusion and stop both?
They weren’t replying seriously. It’s a reference to the film “Clerks II.”