• fizzle@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I can see what OP is getting at but it’s really an argument around semantics, and sentence structure.

    For example, we don’t say “Some fruits are similar to Apples”, because it sounds daft and it’s redundant.

    On the other hand saying “Pears are similar to Apples” is of course fine, and helpful to someone who’s never seen a Pear.

    Like most shower thoughts, they’re pointing out something obvious, but in an emotive way. “Primates aren’t like us, we are like them!”

    • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      In terms of biology, specifically botany, we do say some fruits are similar to apples. This comparison seems like a biological one too.

    • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s important to combat anthropocentric bias. Primates came first we’re actually the newest ones, so if we share behaviors, they did it first and we copied them.