VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 2 days agoWell actually...lockdiscuss.onlineimagemessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1548arrow-down1112file-text
arrow-up1436arrow-down1imageWell actually...lockdiscuss.onlineVetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square77fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarePixel_Jock_17@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down4·2 days agoIt definitely is generalizing all men by the sentence structure, sometimes “men’s”, which men? Oh just “men” in general. But otherwise yeah, 100% “some” men’s egos are fragile. Its generalized because it doesn’t make a case to isolate a sub-group of men.
minus-squareWren@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down3·2 days ago“Sometime men egos can be fragile” is a weird sentence.
minus-squarevelma@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down5·2 days agoWhich men? Men whose egos are fragile. You can acknowledge that some men are like that without being one of them yourself.
It definitely is generalizing all men by the sentence structure, sometimes “men’s”, which men? Oh just “men” in general.
But otherwise yeah, 100% “some” men’s egos are fragile. Its generalized because it doesn’t make a case to isolate a sub-group of men.
“Sometime men egos can be fragile” is a weird sentence.
Which men? Men whose egos are fragile. You can acknowledge that some men are like that without being one of them yourself.