• Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t want a tool to avoid Flock cameras. I want a tool that uses my Bluetooth to turn Flock cameras into bricks.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Need to figure out a small scale, cheap, EMP device that can be set off to fry the cameras and sensors, but nothing else that is around.

      • spicy pancake@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        maybe some kinda really directional antenna? like a laser but for the radio range of EM

        need to have line of sight and accurate aim, however

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Agreed, though I would expect one to not be carrying anything that could be affected by such a device, whilst deploying said devices. So personal devices don’t count as needing protection AFAIC

          • T156@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            If it’s using Bluetooth to knacker them, then all the nearby Bluetooth devices would be vulnerable.

            Medical equipment these days also can feature Bluetooth for mobile connectivity, and you can’t exactly go without your defibrillator, hearing aids, or insulin pump.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      If you want a tool that turns Flock cameras into bricks, all you need is a brick.

      … Or wire cutters, or a big hammer, or an angle grinder, or a drill, or a large rock, or a can of spray paint, etc, etc, etc. They’re not terribly resilient against physical damage.

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’ve been thinking of buying a slingshot and some paintballs. For another, completely irrelevant purpose though, obviously.

        • OwOarchist@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Remember to mask up when you’re going out playing with paintballs – for covid safety! Wear sunglasses, too – you don’t want eye damage from the bright sunlight.

          Oh, and perhaps most importantly, leave your phone at home. Wouldn’t want to accidentally hit your phone with a paintball, would you?

        • flandish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          problem is the camera sees you offing it. unless you bloc up way away, and not near your own stuff.

    • wildflower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I would think that a simple laser-pointer pointed at the camera would be enough to damage the sensor?

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Lasers would be quite risky. Anything that powerful would also instantly obliterate peoples’ vision if there’s a reflection and it gets them in the eye.

      • modus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You’ll need around a 1-watt green (532nm) laser pointer. That’s gonna run you about $500 and they’re kinda dangerous.