- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmit.online
- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmit.online
I think this would be an opportunity for a targeted protest. It’s clear that the officials don’t like people talking about their corruption, so it would be a shame if people showed up at their offices and kept talking about it.
(Of course, staging a coordinated protest isn’t trivial, particularly if you need to prepare speakers for going to jail, and keeping it up requires a lot of patience and tenacity. Change rarely comes easy.)
Dude went a few SECONDS over his time and they arrested him. Even when he said he was done speaking.
Full text because I hate the sign in banner:
In February, police in Claremore, Oklahoma arrested farmer Darren Blanchard for speaking a little too long during a community meeting about data centers. The city charged Blanchard with criminal trespass, a crime with a $200 penalty, but he’s vowed to fight the charge. He recently shared video of the bodycam footage for the first time with 404 Media and answered our questions about the moment cops arrested him for going over his time at a February 17 community meeting of the Claremore City Council.
The plan in February was for the City Council to listen to the concerns citizens had about a planned data center called Project Mustang. The residents of Claremore don’t want the data center and largely feel like the construction project was approved without their input. City officials signed non-disclosure agreements on behalf of the project’s developers and haven’t been forthcoming with details about its construction.
Blanchard told 404 Media that his legal team filed a motion to dismiss the charge and requested the city’s attorney recuse himself as he was present at the city council meeting and witnessed the arrest.
“I continue to maintain that my arrest was retaliatory, as I was engaging in protected speech at a public meeting. These actions as well as the undue resulting responses by the City of Claremore should raise major concern,” Blanchard said. “For now, I am allowing the legal process to move forward at whatever pace that may be. I am confident the truth will eventually come out, and remain steadfast in that this charge should never have been brought in the first place.”
Blanchard said he has no criminal history and that his arrest has been overwhelming. “Even if my charges are dismissed and the arrest is deemed unlawful, the process I have endured is the penalty,” he said. “I went to a public meeting to speak about an issue affecting my community of Northeast Oklahoma […] I ended up in handcuffs, jailed and later seeing that moment played and replayed nonstop on television and social media. That is not something you simply move past.”
He said that he’s glad his arrest has brought attention to the fight against data centers. Communities deserve transparency, due process and protection from being industrialized without meaningful public input. But personally, it has been traumatic,” he said. “What concerns me most is the chilling effect. If someone can be arrested after speaking at a public meeting, others may decide it is safer to stay quiet. That should trouble everyone, regardless of where they may stand on data centers, artificial intelligence, energy infrastructure or matters of economic development.”
Blanchard said he’s not shocked by the rise of anti-data center sentiment in America. “Across the country, people are beginning to recognize that these projects are not just abstract technology investments. They impact land, water, electricity rates, housing, agriculture and the overall character of our communities,” he said.
“A pattern is unfolding where these developers come in with promises of jobs and investment, public officials are swayed to move quickly, oftentimes incognito via nondisclosure agreements and the long-term costs are pushed onto residents who had little say in the process,” he said. “Whether it is rising utility bills, unsustainable demands on our water, transmission lines and the concern for eminent domain, nonsensical tax incentives or the loss of farmland and rural ways of life, people are asking a very basic question: who is this ultimately serving?”
Blanchard raised some of these issues during the February community meeting. In an attempt to accommodate the overwhelming number of people who wanted to speak, the City of Claremore established a hard and fast three minute time limit for people talking during public comments.
In the bodycam footage, Blanchard went a few seconds over that three minutes and two police officers swooped in.
“You need to leave,” one officer said.
“I’m done with the mic,” Blanchard said. He held up documents he brought with him. “Can I present my records?”
“Sir, you’ve been asked to leave,” the cop said. Blanchard walks to the front of the room, begins to give his documents to the city council and the officers follow.
“You can give them to Sarah and then let’s go,” one of the officers said. “You’ve been asked to leave.”
“This is a public meeting,” Blanchard said as he sorted through the documents.
“OK. You can give them to Sarah but you’ve been asked to leave,” the officer said.
“On what grounds?” Blanchard said.
“Right now,” the officer said.
“I said on what grounds?” Blanchard said.
“Arrest him,” an officer, identified from the police report as Sergeant Sanger, said. Then the two officers had Blanchard’s hands behind his back and in cuffs. The crowd booed and shouted.
“That’s a cowardly thing to do,” a woman shouted over the noise of the crowd as the officers escorted Blanchard out.
A man yelled, “So you can break the law but we can’t?”
Another woman rushed to one of the police officers, her phone out and filming. “This is ridiculous,” she said. “It’s ridiculous, people.”
The arrest hasn’t stopped Blanchard from speaking out. He’s appeared on local news outlets several times and is speaking out against the data center in public every chance he gets. “When utility bills rise, when land is taken or devalued, when public resources are committed and when tax breaks are handed out without real accountability, that functions as a de facto tax on the local citizenry. So the question becomes one of representation,” Blanchard told 404 Media. “Were the people truly heard, or were these decisions effectively made before the public ever entered the room?
He’s also confident he’ll prevail in the courts. “I still believe justice will be done, but again, the process itself has already become part of the punishment. That cannot be undone,” he said.
The Claremore Police Department did not respond to 404 Media’s request for a comment.
How can all those people keep sitting down while watching that?
The criminal justice system really is punitive from the very beginning.
Thank you! 404 seems to stick to facts, but that sign in stuff really is annoying
I was a subscriber to them in the month they launched. After the literal 10th time the headline was clickbait that disagreed with the body of the article, I unsubscribed. They are run by the former Cracked/BuzzFeed people and they clearly can’t help themselves but lie in headlines.
I never trust any headline blindly
Yea but their whole founding pitch was “we’re paid journalism so we won’t have to do sensationalism” was such a bait and switch :(

All 14 of them have been checked, congratulations US of A… you are the fascists you’ve always strive to be!
…slow clap…
I get that per Wikipedia, the source of these is:
In the Spring 2003 issue of the secular humanist magazine Free Inquiry, Laurence W. Britt, who is described as “a retired international businessperson, writer, and commentator” published “Fascism Anyone?”, which included a list of 14 defining characteristics of fascism.
But you have to get that a random unsourced image of white text on a black background is some real “trust me bro” Facebook shares from Grandma type shit.
Getting tired of “it’s okay when our side does it because we’re right, but we’ll clown on it when the bad people do it because they’re wrong”. Just be better.
And while I’m complaining, the source of these is a fucking editorial by someone with no actual credentials or qualifications to declare this shit. Now it’s being passed around online like it’s certifiable fact because it sounds accurate.
All of those are problems. All of those are bad. What is happening in the USA is bad. But muddying the waters by taking random bullshit like this as certified fucking fact only makes talking about shit harder, as everyone has their own set of things they think are truth, most of which have been latched on to for no reason more than “it sounds right and reinforced my beliefs”.
Grumble grumble grumble

I assume the list is trying to reference Umberto Eco’s Ur Fascism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ur-Fascism
While the current US regime fulfills many if not all of those criteria, it does not yet have the absolute control over the country that other fascist regimes had. The emphasis being on “yet”
You spent an awful lot of energy on whining when you could have just added the source easily yourself lol


Don’t think the last one has been completely ticked when you have people like Mamdani getting elected. But don’t worry, Trump and his minions are working around the clock to change that.
🌎🧑🚀🔫🧑🚀
Always has been
ACAB
Typical Claremore cops.
So long, free speech

No it’s: So long, now arrested
tl;dr too long; don’t resist
Because freedom.









