• sleet01@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        blows dust off classic Fellowes floppy disk caddy

        “Gimme some sugar, baby!”

          • PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            I know that a Samsung teevee disconnected from the internet will try and use another appliances internet connection if it can. Gotta imagine this is possible in other devices, too.

            • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Last year I started maintaining a MAC address whitelist on the router: if I haven’t added it, it doesn’t get in or go out. No way in hell I’m putting any household appliance on the allowed list. While an appliance could technically still try to access via an allowed device, they’re all phones and tablets and computers with slightly more robust security than the trust me bro levels of an IoT appliance.

              • Zoot@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Just gotta hope your neighbors don’t connect their devices, and that your own can’t reach the neighbors.

            • dust_accelerator@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Can you share more info on this? I’m interested in the technical aspect how this is done, specifically which devices it uses?

              For instance, say, a smart speaker, may have Bluetooth and WiFi, but I’m not sure any halfway comprehensive network stack I’d even implemented that could be used as a proxy, let alone autonomously remotely reconfigured to do so.

              • PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                If memory serves correctly it was another Samsung device it was leveraging which makes more sense. There were other occasions where it had once been attached to WiFi for a firmware update, disconnected and told to forget the network, but attached again to it at least twice. Took the steps to forget the network again and then powered off completely. Subsequent checks show no further connections so far.

                • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I’ve also heard of devices that scan for open networks in the area to use. It’s also possible for them to come with a sim card and use a discounted cell collection, though not sure if any TVs are actually doing that. Could even be a virtual SIM so there’s no card to find and potentially just remove/destroy.

  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I don’t really get it other than changing its convenience and efficiency. Superglue and wall loops make stronger parts of multiple pieces than priting it all in one.

    Maybe poor wording? I just mean their task is enormous to filter these parts in a way that actually targets them and nothing else and splitting pieces will invariably be the new technique for those people who are making them. The thing is when you’re making gun pieces it’s a disposable or sellable piece meaning they’re likely producing multiple of the same models. They will easily adapt techniques that continue to work for them while our prints get filtered into that group despite having nothing to do with guns.

    I also think we should be able to print whatever the fuck we want with our own devices, but even from their perspective it’s not going to work. This seems like a handwave attempt at garnering plausible deniability from high profile cases of murder as well as sucking up to politicians and pretending they actually care about the problem.

    Also in my original post I forgot this applies to CNC machines too, this is going to be a shitshow.