#believewomen unless the guy sexually harassing office staff is part of “the cause” in which case ignore women and assume they must be agents of the enemy.
Khan also said that a 5,000-page report by the UN’s Office of Internal Oversight Services had cleared him of all wrongdoing. Moreover, the ICC’s ‘Bureau’ – the ICC’s main oversight body – appointed three judges to digest the report. The judges confirmed on 21 March 2026 that there was not a single piece of evidence suggesting any misconduct by Khan.
However the ICC board (which is not a judicial body) made the decision to remove him.
Quick guilty verdict? That’s not a presumption of innocence.
Do you think Trump arresting Maduro was a good thing? What criteria should be used? Should some court in Europe have jurisdiction over the world? It’s it even a legal system when it’s motivated by politics?
Also Netanyahu isn’t going to be arrested. The ICJ doesn’t have an army to enforce their decrees on parts of the world that don’t recognise their legitimacy. Issuing these kinds of orders only hurt is legitimacy (don’t issue orders that won’t be followed!) and only creates an equivalence between their actions and Trump’s actions with Maduro.
#believewomen unless the guy sexually harassing office staff is part of “the cause” in which case ignore women and assume they must be agents of the enemy.
Yet another way y’all are exactly like MAGAs.
Did you read the article, dumb-dumb?
However the ICC board (which is not a judicial body) made the decision to remove him.
#believewomen was always just a self-serving argument promoted by Biden and co. for political gain.
What we should (and legally have) to believe is innocence until proven guilty.
Do you believe Netanyahu is innocent until proven guilty?
Of course. With the level of evidence the ICJ has against him, they can order an arrest; this should turn out to be a quick verdict.
Quick guilty verdict? That’s not a presumption of innocence.
Do you think Trump arresting Maduro was a good thing? What criteria should be used? Should some court in Europe have jurisdiction over the world? It’s it even a legal system when it’s motivated by politics?
Also Netanyahu isn’t going to be arrested. The ICJ doesn’t have an army to enforce their decrees on parts of the world that don’t recognise their legitimacy. Issuing these kinds of orders only hurt is legitimacy (don’t issue orders that won’t be followed!) and only creates an equivalence between their actions and Trump’s actions with Maduro.