• dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Yes. This has been theorized, but with the obvious limitation of building anything big enough to attenuate the sun’s output to a visible degree.

    Right now we look for periodic dimming of distant stars, in order to ID exoplanets as they orbit and block light. We also look for any wobble from the gravitational pull of a large orbiting body, like Jupiter-sized things.

    As for artificial dimming, that more or less falls under the concept of a “Dyson Swarm/Sphere”, and is something we’re keeping an eye out for too. Your signal concept would be carefully orchestrated windows in that swarm, as it orbits. But the energy and sheer mass requirements (measured in substantial fractions of whole planets) are at a level of civilization well beyond anything we can do at present. So there may be something out there, but we’re in no position to do the same.

  • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Assuming signals could be interpreted on the other side your looking at a 2.5 million year ping to send something to Andromeda.

  • Kwdg@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Hypotheticly yes, but you would need something very big to block the light or reduce it. Planet sized for example, this is one way we detect planets around other stars, by measuring how much the light dims.

    Another potential problem is that (at leas according to this wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nearest_galaxies) the closest galaxy is around 33000 light years away. So any signal we send will take 33000 years to get there and any potential return would take the same amount of time, so 66000 years in total. That is far longer than any human civilization exists

      • Kwdg@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Ah sorry, I probably wasn’t clear enough what I meant (and am not super knowledgable here and probably have a western bias). What I meant was civilization defined like this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cradle_of_civilization not that there weren’t any cultures earlier. I basically just wanted to say that 66000 years is a very long time in human time scales

    • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      First part, wouldnt that only depend on the amount of light that you need to block for them to detect and couldn’t you place the shutter further away to reduce its size?

      Also, name a faster way to transmit data intergalaxtically

      Edit: also, since we are already transmitting light couldn’t we just send images. If life such as us is who we want to reach wouldnt it only make sense to design for our own light receptors?

      • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Nothing would beat light as far as transmission goes. Also, the further the shutter the further that doesn’t matter. As the galaxy expands you might block light for something that’ll have moved away and miss the signal, so it’s a pretty big risk to try and position this shutter strategically enough to make that work.

        However, a fun thing to think about is, after you make your signal thing to broadcast, by the time that message reaches other galaxies, 33k years is long enough that other life might very well have come into existence and evolved.

        Even crazier to think someone out there may have already broadcast their own message and we don’t have the means or technology to receive it or notice because they are so many others out there, OR it just hasn’t reached us yet. Maybe in another could thousand years.

      • Kwdg@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Sure you can put it farther away, but the sun is massive, it would still need to be pretty big I would guess, but I’m not an astronomer so I don’t know the numbers.

        As far as I know we don’t know of any faster way to send signals. That doesn’t make sending the signals impossible, just very impractical.

        • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          How about this, we point it at blackholes hoping they act as a worm hole and then are transmitted to people a million years in the past and we instruct them to write the data down on stone tablets so when they advance due to also giving them advance technology they remember to send a note back.

          • Kwdg@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Sure we can do that, but then we can also just think hard about it and hope anyone hears it, not much of a difference

            • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              Thats all just math’s. We could create a theoretical model and send enough data where we maximize the probability. All be, the probability would still be starkly low but still an interesting thought experiment.

      • slazer2au@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        While radio telescopes are arguably slower then the speed of light, being able to encode and compress data into a radiowave is a faster way to communicate.

          • slazer2au@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Light is pure energy. While radio is energy it also contains information which means it is slower.

            • safesyrup@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              13 hours ago

              That is not true. The propagation speed of light and radio waves in the same medium is exactly the same. It’s both electromagnetic waves

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Yeah sure, you could do that.

    Speed of light does not change. So you’re still looking at a stupid long latency.

    How do you block and unblock the light quickly? The faster this goes the more data per second you’ll get.

  • neopenguin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Keep in mind, our sun is just one of hundreds of billions of stars in our galaxy. So, this would be like writing a message on a grain of sand, adding it to 20 or so dump truck loads of sand, spreading it out, and trying to pick out your message from the surface of Mars.

  • Professorozone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Look up The Fermi Paradox.

    In this case basically, even if you could do this, which practically we couldn’t, there won’t be anyone to hear it and if there is we won’t be here to get the response.

    • wilt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Within the Fermi Paradox is the Dark Forest Hypothesis, essentially: we can’t see other civilizations doing this, and the theory is that if they did they are wiped out immediately by other civilizations.

      The Three Body Problem is a good novel exploring this.

      It is akin to being invisible in a dangerous place and then turning on a flashlight and giving your position away to predators.

        • wilt@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It’s complex. Essentially our two systems were close enough to traverse with their technology and it was worth their while due to their systems instability.

          The title “Three Body Problem” is referencing their systems three suns and their world’s unstable orbit.

          It’s worth the read.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Even if there is life, the speed of light is so slow and signal degradation over distance so high it is unlikely we could detect each other even if everyone was trying.