• Apeman42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Because it’s one thing to not shame ignorance, and quite another to entertain people who are being deliberately obtuse.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s certainly reasonable to offer a charitable interpretation of the question, rather than assume mal-intent.

      “What would it take for an AI to be given governance over the world?”

      • Toes♀@ani.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Yeah that’s pretty much what I was going for.

        Kinda surprised about the downvotes but glad people came out to comment about it anyways.