

assuming they can fight off the revolutionaries who just overthrew the much bigger government, that is


assuming they can fight off the revolutionaries who just overthrew the much bigger government, that is


Apparently that’s only for blob storage (now "object storage), not https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_blob


That’s privilege escalation for you. 7.8 is pretty high.


You can only gain power if you manage to take it from others, who won’t just bolt away and surrender their agency. Instead, for the hungry you say, authority should be enough for such self-actualization. The difference to power is that instead of forceful mandates, authority is enabled by well-earned community trust, which is far more gratifying (and revocable).


The compressed binary blob is just a 160 B ELF when uncompressed. I don’t think you can do much with that.


I’m not sure how much of it is obfuscation and how much of it is golfing. Ze golfed it so ze could make the pretty valid “just 732 bytes python script” claim.
The compression could very well be just a way to write a binary in Python plaintext. ChatGPT claims it just attempts to sudo, run /bin/sh if that succeeds, and exit if that fails.


If organizing has gotten to the point where an anarchist revolution has happened, then enough of that spirit will be left so that the people are brave enough to stop those who try to create property again out of nothing. Anarchy is governance by society and social pressure instead of government force.


(fwiw note that this was a case of Sovereign Citizen tax protesting, not tax striking/resistance. i couldn’t find info on Tea Party supporting this though the movement is tangentially related to SovCit)


During the standoff, a number of supporters were camped outside his home and were encouraged to record any attempt to take Brown from his house. This policy of opening the door to supporters led to the successful arrest of the couple by United States Deputy Marshals who disguised themselves as supporters.


Anarchy is also the abolition of property and profit incentives.


I think I’m going to trust Ubuntu more since the pretty ambitious 25.10 release. They made telemetry opt-in (it was opt-out) in 26.04.
i’m guessing those trans pride colors in the sign weren’t intentional then…
(like look at that these are like the only pastel colors)


instance name checks out 🔥
ah, Deutsche-Welle, Germany’s NPR. they are really good, and they publish articles too.
note that this is a video channel that doesn’t seem to produce articles. every single piece on the frontpage is clickbait. Let’s see if they’re also BS.
The End of Israel: The Ultimate Evidence
You won’t see this on the BBC or CNN
This is just what every Lemming knows about Israel already + “no apartheid could possibly endure”. The video ends on “When and how the system of ethnic supremacy in the eastern Mediterranean comes to an end is impossible to foresee, but end it will.”
I see no original research.
British Journalist UNCOVERS SHOCKING Iran War COVER-UP
You won’t see this on the BBC or CNN
Peter Oborne, US Politics, Global Politics
This is just “British journalism is bad”, illustrated with examples from Daily Mail, Telegraph, BBC. I mean, you’re not wrong, but…
No revelations here. The Guardian isn’t even mentioned and I think The Guardian is still pretty good.
Domestic UK affairs are undeserving of the label “Global Politics” and absolutely not “US politics”.
At this point I don’t want to analyze more videos. I’ll just post the headlines of the other four pieces on the frontpage.
HE’S ACTUALLY DOING IT: Trump, Israel, and the End of the Global Economy
The ULTIMATE Betrayal
Richard Sanders - US Politics, Global PoliticsLowkey EXPOSES Trump’s Iran War for Israel
Lowkey EXPOSES Trump’s Iran War for Israel
Lowkey - US Politics, Global PoliticsIran War EXPOSED: The Video Trump Doesn’t Want You To See
How Trump BETRAYED America for Israel
Matt Kennard - US Politics, Global PoliticsWhy Trump REALLY Attacked Iran
The Chilling Truth Behind Trump’s Dark Agenda
Lowkey - US Politics, Global Politics
note this neat, website-exclusive disclosure:
The views expressed in this video belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of DDN.
unwilling to take accountability, DDN’s editorial board does not seem strong.


I’m guessing you have examples? I don’t see anything I wouldn’t expect in the closeup in https://www.nickiswift.com/1909492/plastic-surgeon-trump-ear-injury-one-year-after-butler-shooting/


https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/karoline-leavitt-shots-fired/
TL;DR: the press secretary used the slang meaning “trump’s fiery speech at the dinner will absolutely annihilate our enemy journalists (with jabs)”
how is this oniony