• 10 Posts
  • 216 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 19th, 2023

help-circle


  • For once I actually agree with Democratic leadership on this point of election strategy. Unless they win the Senate, a third impeachment wouldn’t really accomplish anything. If they win control of the Senate (and can actually get all their people to agree to do it), then an impeachment trial would at least force all of Trump’s skeletons out of the closet for the world to see.

    I can think of several impeachable offences:

    • Bribery, for accepting a jet from Qatar
    • Bribery, likely from AI/crypto companies (not proven so far but almost certainly occurred)
    • Bribery, for selling pardons
    • Sexual assault, a high crime or misdemeanour, for Epstein Island activities
    • Being an accomplice to interstate sex trafficking, ditto
    • Violations of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, a high crime or misdemeanour as the Act doesn’t have any other enforcement mechanism, leaving impeachment as the default
    • Malfeasance in public office, a high crime or misdemeanour, for all the rather obvious grift arising from the actions that funnel taxpayer funds to enterprises connected with his family
    • Together with the acting Attorney-General, conspiring to defraud the United States, a high crime or misdemeanour, concerning the so-called settlement with the IRS for “leaking his tax returns”




  • Let’s see what the great American magnates of the past are remembered for:

    • Henry Ford was remembered for selling his cars at a low enough price and paying his workers a high enough wage that they could easily afford to buy the cars they made.
    • Andrew Carnegie was known for paying for the construction of a library in every town.
    • J. P. Morgan was known for bailing out the economy of New York using his personal wealth and influence when the Federal Reserve did not yet exist.

    All these men were also known as ruthless barons of industry who stamped out those who opposed them without second thought, but at least they also did a fair bit of good to at least try to offset their ills. Elon is just openly a horrible person. History will not be kind to his memory.


  • Hakeem Jeffries is criticising members of what is functionally another party. The DSA is an insurgency whose members use the label of the Democratic Party only because the United States has a broken electoral system that forces them to. They don’t listen to the leaders of the Democratic Party, they’re only here to use the resources that the nameplate can unlock. They nominate their own candidates, talk against the Democratic leadership, and time and time again, trounce Democratic nominees in elections in the areas where they are strong. The DSA is a party within the party, and Jeffries is utterly wasting his time crying about this.

    The DSA being treated as an unruly faction of a party he supposedly leads is laughable. The age of moderates is over. Those who remain in office next year should look to the DSA members who occupy the benches as a coalition partner; an equal political force, not a subordinate.



  • There’s this related thing in linguistics which is quite fun, relating to the terms loanword and calque, which both mean “words originating from foreign languages”: The word calque is a loanword, and the word loanword is a calque.

    A calque is a literal translation of the components of a word. One of the most commonly calqued words across all languages is skyscraper (in Chinese, it’s 摩天大楼, “sky-touching large building”). The word loanword is a calque of German Lehnwort (lehnen, to borrow + Wort, word).

    A loanword is a word which is taken directly from another language and, with exceptions to fit the receiving language’s grammar and pronunciation, is not translated. An example of an English word which has been calqued into many languages is “okay”. The word calque is a loanword from French, where it means “copy”.




  • You’re free to propose alternative charities. Maybe even a local food bank or some organisation. The point is: I’m happy to put my money where my mouth is, and I don’t think you are. In fact, even if you lose the bet, I don’t think you’d do it anyway. After all, I’m just some guy on the Internet.

    I don’t have “faith” in the US legal system. I just know more than you about how it works and how it doesn’t.



  • Unlike what most people seem to think, the US criminal court system is not broken in such a manner that would allow someone to go to prison for years for this. Trump prosecutors have a reputation for poor performance in court. All the competent prosecutors have quit or were pushed out for failing to prosecute obviously loser cases or sign legally unsound court filings. All that are left are the idiot Trump loyalists whose only experience in criminal law is being arrested for drink driving.

    Grand juries refuse to indict these defendants for obviously trivial crimes, and trial juries will acquit.

    They tried to charge someone with assaulting a federal agent for lobbing a sandwich at a Border Patrol goon during a protest. The Trump-appointed chief prosecutor in Washington made a TikTok about how they were coming down hard on protestors. It went to trial. The jury acquitted.

    I remind that juries have to be drawn from the local area (i.e. Washington, DC) and the city hates Trump’s guts. He lost by over 80 percentage points in the last election there.


  • Regardless of whether any beatings occurred, when someone is imprisoned in your country, they are under your care, and you are responsible for them. It doesn’t matter whether it’s malnutrition, beatings, or if he just smacked his head against the wall on his own accord really hard: it is the responsibility of the custodian to ensure the good and proper health of those in their custody. That is the position of international human rights law. It doesn’t even matter if a prisoner decides to kill themselves, a death in custody is always the responsibility of the custodian and in that case it’d still be the custodian’s fault for allowing the creation of circumstances that allows prisoners to kill themselves.

    It is not usual for a person to suddenly become comatose while in custody. And even if that did happen, it was North Korea’s positive responsibility to notify consular officials and the family of that, and deliver proper medical care to them.