Dr. Taco

If you want to get pedantic, you have to figure out how to be accurate. Breaking a sentence into bullet points doesn’t make it separate claims. The word “and” means that for the sentence to be true, all of the components must be. You made one claim, with multiple aspects and evidence that does not support 2/3 of them at all.

I think the other user had it right, so I’m going to steal this one: stay ignorant friendo

This is what happens when you google something to support your made-up fact, rather than base your argument on the research.

Your claim was that this applies to most, but not all trans women. Your link provides literally zero support of that.

This bad faith, scientifically illiterate shit is why people are generally inclined to dismiss you as spewing ignorant bar talk and move on without trying to change your mind. Your stance wasn’t set based on current, relevant research and therefore isn’t likely to be changed by it.

Men have a significant advantage over women when it comes to strenght and speed and in most (but not all) cases this applies to trans women as well.

Nothing about your comments indicates a willingness to change your mind. However, your statement above is the first concrete statement of the thread, so it seems like the onus would fall on you to support the claim, rather than /u/astro_city@fedio.io to refute it. If you make factual claims without evidence, nobody’s especially obligated to provide evidence to tell you that your made-up facts are wrong.