• FreedomAdvocate
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Now do “renewables”.

    Neither should be subsidised.

    Also:

    Supporters say fuel excise is collected to fund roads and businesses that use the fuel to run cars and equipment on private roads and properties should not have to pay it.

    They’re right.

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      No they’re not right. That fuel all ends up in the atmosphere, and the spent rubber ends up in the sea. It costs money to clean all that up.

        • blind3rdeye@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Well, someone has to pay to clean up that stuff, and perhaps it would be fair if that money came from the people causing the damage - right? Perhaps somehow pay for the health impacts from the reduced air quality too. Maybe that’s too much to ask?