• FreedomAdvocate
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    Those are different to taking over private companies. The government should, imo, compete against private enterprise in those areas, in turn bringing prices down and making it better for the taxpayers.

    NASA is government owned. Look at the state of it. Do you think the government taking over SpaceX would really be a good thing?

    • Kickforce@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You think the state of NASA isn’t caused by privately funded politicians?

      • FreedomAdvocate
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        So you think those privately funded politicians should be in charge of the state of SpaceX?

        • Kickforce@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          No, the private funding of politicians, which nowhere in the world happens as thoroughly or blatantly as in the US, is another issue to solve. It’s companies pushing for privatization of services that they sabotage first to show that the government doesn’t do well with them. It’s like the postal service headed by that Trump appointee that was a big cheese in a transport firma. I forgot his name.

          • FreedomAdvocate
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            So they were sabotaging nasa for all those years before SpaceX was a thing for what reason?