• moondoggie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    1 day ago

    However, the FCC approved the satellite, noting the grant is only “for a single demonstration satellite” to test an innovative technology that could advance American leadership in space.

    “C’mon baby, just the tip…”

    We live in the stupidest timeline.

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s more of a “sure, you can waste money on that” sort of approval.

      People don’t really understand the scale of what’s needed to actually put large structures in space. Or in this case 50,000 satellites.

      The plan is horrifically bad, but also completely unfeasible.

      The FCC shouldn’t be enabling this scam, but I’m not that worried.

      Or no more worried about this scam than any of the dozen of active scams by semi-competent tech bro billionaires.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s not horribly large, really. It’s a super thin reflective film that unfolds.

        It does seem like it would need way too many in the sky to be financially viable. Like, the cost would be much more prohibitive than paying for land and probably like 15% more solar panels to get the equivalent amount of solar electricity. Not to mention the global warming of 50,000 of these to be directing 3 mile areas of extra sunlight.

        I say let them build and launch one to see what it can do, but never let them stick up 50,000.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is a wild take.

        Space mirrors are not a new idea, they’re a very old one, a staple of sci-fi only now being tested in reality.

        They stated that this is a small scale demonstrator, just to test the technology. The goal would be to get some real world measurements and decide on whether it could be economical and realistic going forward.

        What part of that is a scam? I would say it’s perhaps overly optimistic, but it’s a perfectly honest exploration of engineering.