• Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    this relies on having enough tourists that it’s worth the infrastructure for having fares, otherwise it’ll just cost more than it brings in.

    • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Check out the municipal finances of lots of US cities. Auto infrastructure costs more than the taxes it generates from economic activity. The federal government fills a lot of funding gaps through grants with its deficit spending. Yes, free public transport would cost more than it brings in through direct revenues; it would still cost less than private car subsidies, and could be a net positive in economic activity stimulated, unlike the cars.

    • untorquer@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Like i said, i prefer free for everyone which would make more sense in low-tourism locals.