• poVoq@slrpnk.netM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Because it isn’t a ban on burqas (which alone would also be problematic on grounds of religious freedom), but a general ban on all face covering in public. And this should be obviously a problem both for health reasons (respiratory masks) and video surveillance with face recognition.

        • CactusEcho@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          yes there are. Exceptions:

          • Health, professional, artistic, entertainment or advertising reasons;

          • Places of worship and diplomatic and consular premises, as well as aircraft;

          • Weather conditions, security reasons or other situations provided for by law.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I have not checked the details in the actual law, so maybe.

    • CAVOK@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It might not be, or it might, but I somehow don’t believe that the far-right who proposed this had the well-being of women and girls in mind.

      • xcel@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Ok ? Does this matter? It still seems like a good idea. How are you supposed to identify someone if they commit a crime? If it was a mask it would be illegal

        • crapwittyname@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          The wellbeing of women and girls matters, yes.

          In fact, their wellbeing (along with everyone else’s) is exactly why you would be trying to stop crime in the first place.

          How are you supposed to identify someone if they commit a crime?

          They’re wearing a fucking burka FFS, it’s a pretty good way to identify a person. It’s about as easy as it gets. Also, have you ever tried to run from the cops in one of those things? It’s a fool who chooses that as their getaway clothing.

          • xcel@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            If everyone wears a burqa, how are you meant to tell one person apart from another

            • crapwittyname@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Everyone doesn’t wear a burqa though. The vast majority of people don’t. So, if a crime is committed by someone wearing one, it will be much easier for the police to find them than it would be by recognising the details of their faces.