• iglou@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The title already says “up to” for both the 30% and the sodium content. If the reader understands anything else, that’s a reading comprehension issue.

    • mechoman444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Don’t be a contrarian for the sake of argument. If your reading comprehension is so good you’d know the title is intentionally sensationalized intentionally using large numbers to make it look and sound like they’re always at the upper limits.

      God. I bet you’re insufferable irl aren’t you?

      • iglou@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        The literal wording of the title is “up to”. You’re criticizing it for cherry picking when it’s… not.

        If there’s a contrarian here, it’s certainly not me.

        Nice personal attack though!

        • mechoman444@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Ya. Having “up to” in the title isn’t some magical phrase that excuses the sensational title. And simply claiming that it does isn’t sufficient.

          YSK: Not all raw chicken is the same some is enhanced with a saltwater solution

          This is an example of a neutral title that doesn’t sensationalize and enhance clicks.

          And you started the personal attacks with reading comprehension shtick. So don’t get offended all of the sudden.