• lieven@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Obviously Orbán was a disaster but still many sanction packages got past while he was still in office. It’s not enough of an explanation.

    As for point 2 and 3 - we could have shared the burden. If in a practical sense country A gets hit the hardest, then country B and C can offer support (more likely through some general mechanism, but still).

    It’s just absurd short term thinking, the longer it lasts it only costs us more but also for Ukraine. Death by a thousand cuts just seems a ridiculous strategy in this context.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Obviously Orbán was a disaster but still many sanction packages got past while he was still in office. It’s not enough of an explanation.

      They did but it took a lot of effort and time.

      As for point 2 and 3 - we could have shared the burden. If in a practical sense country A gets hit the hardest, then country B and C can offer support (more likely through some general mechanism, but still).

      They did share the burden but negotiating this took effort and time.

      That’s why it was a slow and gradual process. If they would try to completely cut ties with Russia they would spend years negotiating this before anything was actually done. Doing it gradually let them introduce some sanctions while they worked on the next package.

      • lieven@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I’ll concede :D

        Those are good points. That said, while I understand the politics behind it all from a moral standpoint I find it indefensible.