• TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Did you read the part where this is a radar satellite designed for monitoring the climate? That is, did you read anything besides the headline before you decided: “Yeah, I think I’m able to make informed commentary about this”?

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I don’t know why you’re assuming their ‘/s’ is alluding to sarcasm around this being surveillance versus sarcasm around needing more surveillance. “We need more surveillance (we actually don’t)” seems to be indicated here, not “This is surveillance (it actually isn’t)”.

        Especially when Reddit types are notoriously, chronically unable to read articles before they go spouting uninformed bullshit in the comments.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Why not both?

          (We don’t need more surveillance and this isn’t actually surveillance.)

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      24 hours ago

      A lot of technology has been repurposed for other uses than what they were mutually designed. What’s to stop the operators from using such a high def satellite to spy on people?

      • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Probably because it’s too cheap and primitive? Why use something not specially used to spy on people when you already have significantly designed satellites with a bigger budget and better technology?