• PlantJam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      “All seeing” except it’s using radar to evaluate typography and biomass. What am I missing that makes this “absolutely fucked”?

  • TFO Winder@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    15 hours ago

    This is really cool.

    Anyone know where can I publically find satellite data which is regularly updated, for hobby projects.

  • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Speaking as a layman, I just think it’s fuckin’ awesome how a big chonky boi can be propelled upwards at Mach Yeet and get casually dropped off in orbit.

    Even though Musk is a cunt, I still love watching SpaceX streams to see big bits of metal get put upwards by lots of fire and noise, and then fuckin’ land where they started seven or eight minutes later.

    Science is fuckin mint, man.

    • altphoto@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      4, 3, 2, 1… Reverse! We have reverse!.. And we’re turning… Putting it on D…hit the gas pedal… All systems nominal! The vehicle is gaining speed at 25mph. Entering the 5north at 45mph in climbing… 65! We have reached max Q…honey tell the kids what max Q means…kids, maxQ is when the vehicle sees maximum hydrodynamic pressure.

      Trying to avoid MECO at all costs until we park.

    • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Don’t quote me on this, but I’ve heard SpaceX itself is pretty good at keeping Musk away from the actually important things. Something about having a team dedicated to keeping him distracted.

      • seemefeelme@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Imagine getting a job at SpaceX thinking you’re gonna build a moon base and you get put on ‘Elon distraction’ 😭

      • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Yeah it’s a shame that Musk is so inextricably linked with the brand. I’m quite sure SpaceX and Tesla are full of top tier talent and engineering wizards… but have a direct link to a toxic cockwomble that bankrolls them. Shame.

    • St3alth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      “Mach yeet” is now added to my list of sentences I never knew I wanted to read

      • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        As an engineer I would like to second this motion to get “Mach Yeet” adopted as an IEC standard technical term.

      • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        If I could have crowbarred “moist” in there somewhere too, I’d have set the lexical tiktok on fire.

        …if there is even one, don’t come at me TNETENNBA fans!

    • entwine413@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Have you had a chance to play Kerbal Space Program yet? If not, I think you’d really enjoy it.

      • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I haven’t, no - and you’re probably right, yes.

        I worry that if I start playing KSP then my other half and kids won’t see me again for six months because it does sound fucking awesome and highly rewarding.

        Nope, I’m a simple man. I play through a couple of Doom WADs each summer in the academic off-season and that’s my gaming appetite satiated.

        • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I made the mistake of thinking KSP was a game and not literal mother fucking rocket science.

          There was a lot of explosions and no space.

    • macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Some of these words are meaningless and detract from what you are trying to say. People should not have to be subjected to this nonsense.

      • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Which words do you mean? Because I understand them all. They convey information, the fundamental point of language, hence they don’t detract. Just because you can’t make sense of them doesn’t mean they’re nonsense.

        If you’re talking about “Mach Yeet”, yeet refers to forceful movement. This specific combination then means really fucking fast. The exact speed doesn’t matter. The frivolity of the language underscores their excitement or might just be their idiolect.

        Either way, so long as it’s nothing hateful or harmful (beyond hurting your linguistic sensibilities), trying to police other people’s vocabulary is narrow-minded and needlessly stuck-up.

        Why don’t you yeet that shit (throw it far away) and come join us in watching the fascinating evolution of language?

    • AJ1@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      23 hours ago

      … I think I agree with your sentiment? honestly it’s hard to tell because everything you just said is delivered in this ultra-cringe meme language. I guess this is so the average middle schooler can understand what you’re saying? or is this how robots think humans communicate, so when they want to pretend they’re an “average human internet user”, they talk in this ridiculous idiotic meme codec? idk, whatever, it’s peak cringe, but ok cool comment

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Which part of “chonky boi” or “mach yeet” do you need an average middle schooler to translate for you? Contextually, it’s very clear what is being said for anyone that can read and speaks English.

        You think you know what was said, then insulted it saying it was dumbed down for the average middle schooler. What does that say about you?

    • hraegsvelmir@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Hey, if they want to put themselves through looking at me in the nude, they can inflict that pain on themselves. I’d be more worried about them tracking everything else someone does day to day, and who could get their hands on that data.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      Did you read the part where this is a radar satellite designed for monitoring the climate? That is, did you read anything besides the headline before you decided: “Yeah, I think I’m able to make informed commentary about this”?

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          24 hours ago

          I don’t know why you’re assuming their ‘/s’ is alluding to sarcasm around this being surveillance versus sarcasm around needing more surveillance. “We need more surveillance (we actually don’t)” seems to be indicated here, not “This is surveillance (it actually isn’t)”.

          Especially when Reddit types are notoriously, chronically unable to read articles before they go spouting uninformed bullshit in the comments.

          • snooggums@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            24 hours ago

            Why not both?

            (We don’t need more surveillance and this isn’t actually surveillance.)

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        A lot of technology has been repurposed for other uses than what they were mutually designed. What’s to stop the operators from using such a high def satellite to spy on people?

        • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Probably because it’s too cheap and primitive? Why use something not specially used to spy on people when you already have significantly designed satellites with a bigger budget and better technology?

  • jim3692@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Don’t such satellites have a major flaw, that they revolve? Considering that earth is spherical, those satellites can only monitor some half of the earth each moment, given their sensors have such high FOV.