I debated posting this, but it’s a lazy, rainy Saturday and this is the hot topic, why not?

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards? AdmiralPatrick
  2. What sanction did they impose? Community ban. Additionally, three of my communities were on the tesseract ban list.

I was the one of the first downvotes on the latest post here: https://lemmy.today/post/57202811 which probably instigated the ban.

Aaaand I was linking to the Admiral’s rant all over lemmy, which may have been part of it.

Now, this kinda sucks because I liked tesseract up until I couldn’t mod my own communities anymore, finding out later that they were on the ban list. Of course when a locked post comes up trying to make sense of the community blocks, calling them unstable and unmoderated, I’m gonna downvote that shit.

My username wasn’t even on the original ban list, just those communities.

There’s nothing toxic or unmoderated about anything I run. Not to mention that one of those communities has barely over 100 subscribers and exists just to post a few daily news articles from independent, Canadian sources.

I know nothing about the ban list makes any sense, but blocking three small news communities with posts that rarely get more than two comments and twenty upvotes is crazy. He would have had to search and dig and dig just to find them.

It’s extra nuts considering my brandnewsentence community gets wayyyy more feisty comments than the rest put together, and it’s not blocked.

So there’s your drama, it’s a poor consolation prize for the loss of a pretty good front end. I’m looking forward to the fork and any updates on the ban list.

  • Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    The crashout is been real. It’s nice to see pretty much everyone joining together to say secret blacklists are unacceptable

    • Ostrakon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      33 minutes ago

      I was on the verge of leaving the fediverse because of all the stupid instance politics and tankie horseshit. But it is very refreshinging to see everyone agree that this dude is a turd.

      Watching him double down on this and claim he was justified is insane to me. Dude has completely destroyed any FOSS rep he had, and for what?

    • sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Mood. That kind of thing was low-key why I gave up on trying to persist on reddit. Doesn’t matter as much if it’s just one app here but it’s a shitty precedent to bring into a place where people are championing transparency

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I just read the post you linked to to try and see the explanation for using secret blocklists…

    And it is just typical standard fascist arguments.

    Talking about how some communities are dangerous, calling users “petulant children” and just giving clear authoritarian talking points about how how the dev knows best.

    It is completely unhinged.

    Now, obviously, we all have come across communities and users that we prefer wasn’t a part of the feddiverse, that is fine, we are allowed to think that.

    However, you can’t go around and arbitrarily blocking users and communities for others, and especially not using a secret list.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      At the very least, if you’re gonna abuse your influence with a double-secret shadowban list, you gotta keep that to the worst of the worst - so only assholes would even notice.

      This dunderfuck filtered the word “perchance.”

      • ToastedCoconuts@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I’m not sure if this is the reason, but perchance is an AI image and text generator. The devs of perchance have a community on Lemmy

  • LeonTreatsky [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    16 hours ago

    This is like the third(?) time that some unskilled programmer has forked Lemmy because they were upset that, somehow, leftists exist on a platform built by leftists.

    Inevitably, they “fix” the situation by implementing fresh liberal ideas like heavy censorship without even respecting their users right to choose. They just can’t help but wanting to be Reddit landlords.

  • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    people didn’t like my post saying it was their fault and no reflection on why people were upset?? It must just be people with a grudge against me

    But yeah this entire saga is someone upset people don’t like having things hidden from them in code especially when it effects everything and users have absolutely no control

    • Wren@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      He seems to think the people “brigading” him are the so called “toxic” people he tried to exclude in the first place. He hasn’t clued in that most of us (probably) are pissed off for exactly the reasons you say. Being called a toxic malcontent with a community full of vitriol isn’t great.

  • volore@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Lol. Lmao, even.

    Bro is genuinely furious that nobody sees him as the savior of the fediverse guiding the normies the way his own ego does.

    edit: okay, I admit, I was wrong… There are at least a few of you.

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    This is a different person from the PieFed dev, right? If I had nickel for each time a dev of a popular fediverse software tried to sneak secret censorship into their software… well you get it. Admittedly this one seems way worse than the piefed one. That was reversed, right?

    I just don’t get how anyone would think users would want or even be remotely ok with this.

    Oh yeah PTB, obviously. Banning for downvoting a single post has got to be one of the worst reasons imaginable.

    • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      The piefed stuff has never been secret. If you set up a piefed instance, the options and toggles are right there in the admin settings, and can be turned off by the admins.

      Opinionated fediverse devs writing apps that create the environment they want is a good thing when the bells and whistles they add in can easily be identrified, toggled and adjusted by end users and admins. This is what piefed does. Rimu coding the sort of thing he wants to use is better than Rimu coding nothing because he’s not creating something meaningful to him.

      It’s very different to the tesseract situation, in which the blacklists were obfuscated, so that people wouldn’t even realise they were missing content, and didn’t know how to disable the blacklist even if they did realise it existed.

      • Ricky Rigatoni@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I do feel like piefed should disclose what settings are enabled on the server we’re using. Many of us came to the fediverse to get away from algorithms.

        • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          15 hours ago

          It does disclose it to the admins. I’m not sure how you would disclose it to general users? It’s not really a fediverse norm to expose admin settings to everyone. Though now that you say it, that might be a good thing to normalise?

          • Ricky Rigatoni@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Transparency of things that can affect a user’s experience is always a good thing to normalize to me. Maybe these admin setting values could be exposed with the API so apps and the server finder sites can show them?

    • Wren@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I didn’t hear about the piefed thing getting reversed. Great, if so.

      But yeah, different person.

  • Final Remix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    18 hours ago

    No idea what this is all about, so I read whomever’s “elephant in the room” post on the tesseracts sub, and good god it sounds like someone in the throes of a mental health problem.

  • RaspberryTuba [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    It’s funny that this guy got all sorts of support when he originally “left” and slagged off lemmy. What’s that quote about thinking you’re always surrounded by assholes?

  • Angular@crazypeople.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    19 hours ago

    You know what the Streisand effect is? That’s what all of this bitching about Tesseract is doing. Stoooooppppp

    • Wren@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The Streisand effect is the phenomenon in which an attempt to hide, remove, or censor information results in the unintended consequence of the effort instead increasing public awareness of the information.

      I’m not trying to hide information and I want to bring awareness to it.

      • Angular@crazypeople.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Oops, I think I confused it with something else or I misunderstood it lol. My bad.

        I was trying to say bitching about an asshat dev is only bringing his wanted attention to his project.

        • Wren@lemmy.todayOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Sure, negative attention.

          If a few future users decide they like arbitrary bans and a lack of transparency, I hope they find their happy place.

        • mrdown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I din’t think anybody want to use an tool that may censor them from whatever dumb reason the creator deemed valid

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Not really, in the sense, that they had already been in control and responsible for the parts of the project; this was not something they wanted made known.

    • CubitOom@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      This logic doesn’t apply as the Streisand effect is when someone does something shitty, and then tries to cover it up and it leads to more people finding out about it leading to more people thinking what that person did was shitty.

      The Streisand effect does not equal all publicity is good publicity.

      Trump raping children and then covering it up is the Streisand effect. Saying trump raped children doesn’t promote Trump.

        • CubitOom@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          He’s gloating while retreating with his tail between his legs. And the move people that know what they tried to do, the better.