• Solumbran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah because when a place not only lacks content, but on top of that most of it is shitty spam, it makes people want to engage a lot more, right?

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      About as much as a sarcastic condescending tone.

      Shitty spam is already against the rules. If you see it, report it.

      • Solumbran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        This post is literally about amending the rules to block the kind of shitty spam the discussion is about. Your argument is to not change the rules because there are already rules?

        • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Actually, this post is literally about “should there be an X per Y post limit on users”

          Nothing about redefining “shitty spam.” Just post limits on all users.

          If you want to have a conversation about how to deal with the one person who submits 80% of all posts in this entire community, I totally understand that. But a post limit isn’t the answer. Besides, it’s not like anyone else is competing for that space on the boards.