She said the commission should introduce more flexible carbon dioxide emission limits and adjustment mechanisms so that carmakers could help shape the industry’s transition.

  • thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Absolutely agree on all counts.

    The optimal flow from a consumer and global warming perspective is

    • build out renewables until lowest predictable output exceeds demand, at which point you have massive over generation at peak,

    • utilise excess power generation to crack water for hydrogen (pref sea water)

    • use h2 for making ammonia fertiliser and other viable use cases

    • Use BEVs for personal and busrs and as much as practical caternary overhead power or live rails for trains, trams etc the power should be super cheap given over capacity.

    This of course runs into vested interests

    • fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      (pref sea water)

      doesn’t matter because you have to purify it anyway

      direct hydrogen uses that make sense given hydrogen is cheap are ammonia, methanol (also from biomass), steel and generally speaking fine chemicals. methanol and ammonia can be used as fuels for cases where BEVs don’t work, like shipping. this also requires monstrous overbuild of power grid

      prerequisite for cheap hydrogen (cheap electricity) will also make further electrification make sense and that eats lunch of hydrogen use for power even before hydrogen infra buildout happens

      • thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s not the purification reason that it is “pref sea water” it’s availability and impact of source. Fresh water is becoming a steadily scarcer resource whereas global sea levels are rising.

        • Eheran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          The water you spilt is better than fresh water quality. It does not matter what the source is. The cleaner you start out with, the less effort you need to purify. Sea water takes a far more to purify. You can use that for drinking etc. just as good as H2.

          Also, the amount of water split is just not relevant. 1 GW of production at theoretical efficiency needs less than 300 m³ per hour! Absolutely nothing for such a massive power level. A cooling tower of a 1 GW power plant evaporates something like 10x as much.