• Abyssian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    That would be amazing, but I can’t even consider there’s a chance that it’s anything more than performative. Maybe he genuinely wants that to happen, since he does seem to be one of the few US politicians actually against raping kids, but there’s no way flock doesn’t own a lot of the other politicians and have financial ties and data sharing contracts with bigger companies who own the rest of them.

    • Artisian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      This; anything else is just surveillance companies jockeying for contracts. Let’s ban the thing that’s bad, government’s spying on their own citizens, please.

      • Bilb!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Yeah, as much as I’d enjoy seeing bad things happen to their smarmy dipshit CEO, this is true.

        I suppose a bill like this might help bring the issue to the attention of some number of people, at least.

  • d-RLY?@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    If it does get far enough to be introduced and to actual vote. I am guessing there will be a massive push by Flock to flood news outlets and lobbyists to how “successfully bad guys were caught” or otherwise “prevented.” Probably lock-in on any instance(s) involving children being protected/found. With any and all misleading stats downplaying the actual levels of spying on literally everyone not doing anything illegal (or that children are being scanned and added to those growing databases). And the fucked up cases of false positives that drag those people into court, job losses from being accused/arrested, and financial losses from the first two.

    • LordCrom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Giving up freedom for security…yadda yadda

      Hard counter those efforts with detailed Info on high ranking officials from flock data through FOIA. Educate themasses on what’s is being watched and how all data is combined into a detailed profile

  • jaybone@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 days ago

    Aren’t most of them funded by local governments anyway?

    (And then when the city councils or residents vote to stop it, the cops leave them up anyway?)

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 days ago

      federal bill to withhold federal money from municipalities and police departments that deploy Flock-style automated license plate reader cameras

      This is so such local governments have other funding withdrawn until they get rid of the cameras, presumably

    • hash@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      My local government had funds offered by a federal grant they didn’t apply for. A neighboring county had applied for the federal grant, received a ton of money, and was dishing it out to police across the region.

      • dan1101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Between this and local police working with ICE, it feels like a federal government takeover of everything. The sheriff of a neighboring county has his salary paid by ICE/DHS, and that isn’t right. Federalized police departments.