• teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Just note how the guy starts with “only Microsoft numbers can be trusted” is biased bullshit.

    I would argue misquoting someone to fit your argument is more a egregious example of “biased bullshit”.

    Only Microsoft or OEM partners can tell you with the highest accuracy how many people use Windows now versus five years ago.

    This is literally true. They’re not saying they WILL tell you the accurate numbers, they’re saying only they have those numbers to tell.

    • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I own 6 Windows Professional licenses. I am presently using two. You really think Microsoft are the ones to trust?

      Having numbers others don’t doesn’t make those numbers useful or true in every context.

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        No. No one is telling anyone to “trust Microsoft”, no one is saying “the numbers Microsoft reports are true”. That is a quote the guy above invented from thin air.

        Edit: but for the record, it would be lawsuit territory for MSFT to actually publish false numbers. The shareholders would absolutely ream them. They’re allowed to not post numbers, but they’re not allowed to post false numbers.