• dil@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I feel like im never early to things, so I’ve been using linux for 2 years it’s probably pretty popular and has been for a while now

  • Lurkerino [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have a better metric, Linus tech tips and other PC channels are all talking about linux this year, many even for gaming, the general PC nerd is hearing and learning about linux and considering it as a real choice, so many are absolutelly fed up with windows BS and are swaping to linux. The supposed big problems of linux about having to tinker it all the time, they are just as likely to happen on windows now, except that on linux is something technichal to fix, on windows its the new update fucking everything up, and you know it will keep happening, because they are continually pushing updates, and you did not choose any or use any of those updates. My PC has been crashing about once a day for the past year for some updates that gave me nothing except more settings to turn off every time. Every PC nerd that was not already on linux has been waiting for an alternative for a long time, maybe work requires windows, maybe gaming requiered windows, maybe other people sharing the PC, but all those things are going away, there is no real reason to keep windows, its becoming a walled garden like apple, except apple has better quality i guess(never had a mac, and hated the iphone), windows is a barbed wire garden, easier to get out but if you are used to it you dont want to touch the spikes. Now a part of the fence is broken and people see that the grass is just as green or greener outside.

  • FreddiesLantern@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    What I read is a whole lot of vagueness and assumptions and so n so…

    Anecdotal evidence doesn’t count but Ima use this one today: I know a guy.

    Not a super tech wizard in the slightest but works with pc’s, recently told me he joined the linux camp with bazzite. I think we here on the fediverse all probably know someone who recently switched through proton/bazzite or mint/ubuntu …

    And those might not all stick around, but some will.

    As long as MS keeps shooting themselves in the foot and showing their allegiance to drumpelstilskin and company I’d like to think people are going to take notice.

    It’s not gonna be that old lady next door but her grandson at some point probably will be coming across linux at some point.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yeah I’m having conversations with the most broie business school types and finding out they’re running mint. I grew up not knowing anyone who used Linux except maybe at school.

    • Widukin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Just shutdown my PS5 for good until it will be moddable, and upgraded my mid-tier PC and switched to Bazzite to use it as a game console. After getting used to the new OS, everythings been flawless so far, I’m happy I’ve made the switch.

  • Methio@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    148
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Just note how the guy starts with “only Microsoft numbers can be trusted” is biased bullshit. Pretending a company will give true numbers at all time, is a big lie. If anything they will inflate numbers and they’d try to hide the truth as much as they can because investors are watching.

    While there will be truth in bots taking a part of the traffic, the whole article is Microsoft bootlicker talk.

    Taking another random tool that seems to filter bot for results is just him trying to get a confirmation for his bias.

    Yes a 10% stat at a given time by a given measurement tool, is not equal to a true 10% userbase. Yes there are bots. Yes there are Linux and Windows zombies alike.

    Still, linux desktop is going up, with a fraction of the marketing power Windows and Apple have.

    • _Nemo_@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      2 days ago

      Still, linux desktop is going up, with a fraction of the marketing power Windows and Apple have.

      This isn’t entirely true. Linux is getting a lot of help from Microsoft. <wink wink>

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        They say every million in Microsoft ad spend is a quarter point in Linux desktop share.

    • the_weez@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 days ago

      FWIW this website is always like this, every article I’ve read from latest feels like it came from the MS PR desk.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I wonder why that could be, rofl!

        Surely MSFT would always be clear, transparent, and forthright with the public, ahahahaha!

    • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Just note how the guy starts with “only Microsoft numbers can be trusted” is biased bullshit.

      I would argue misquoting someone to fit your argument is more a egregious example of “biased bullshit”.

      Only Microsoft or OEM partners can tell you with the highest accuracy how many people use Windows now versus five years ago.

      This is literally true. They’re not saying they WILL tell you the accurate numbers, they’re saying only they have those numbers to tell.

      • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I own 6 Windows Professional licenses. I am presently using two. You really think Microsoft are the ones to trust?

        Having numbers others don’t doesn’t make those numbers useful or true in every context.

        • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          No. No one is telling anyone to “trust Microsoft”, no one is saying “the numbers Microsoft reports are true”. That is a quote the guy above invented from thin air.

          Edit: but for the record, it would be lawsuit territory for MSFT to actually publish false numbers. The shareholders would absolutely ream them. They’re allowed to not post numbers, but they’re not allowed to post false numbers.

          • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            34 minutes ago

            They don’t have to publish false numbers. Just keep vague which numbers they are posting. “Total active licenses” was what I referenced earlier.

  • marcie (she/her)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ignoring that the default browsers on many distros are seen as bot traffic, filtering the alleged bot traffic on Linux still results in around 7% of overall traffic, up from 4ish a year ago. It also doesn’t explain the giant leaps in downloads on many distros that correlate with the spike. It’s possible some organization set up a ton of computers with openclaw and a wide variety of distros on it I guess to influence opinion 🤷‍♀️

    Also extremely biased source

  • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    it’s weird (perhaps convenient) that their explanation is “bots” but they don’t mention bot metrics from StatCounter themselves: according to StatCounter numbers, bot traffic share increased 0.37% in July 2026, while Linux Desktop grew 1.92% in the same month.

  • Voytrekk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Copium

    To address some of the author’s points.

    1. MacOS vs OSX: to my understanding, safari reports the OS as OSX still, likely for compatibility reasons. 3rd party browsers such as chrome changed their agent to macOS, which explains the split. macOS users are more likely to use Safari in general.
    2. Bots: Does the author really believe these sites aren’t capable of detecting bots? I’m sure some slip through, but if not traffic were included in general, then Linux would be at a 90% share or higher. They just consume way more page traffic than a human ever could.
    3. Data corrections: Sure, the data may get corrected a bit to bring Linux numbers back down, but there is a clear trend that Linux numbers are rising. It also happens that Windows is where people are migrating from the most.
    4. Official numbers from Microsoft: lol
    • marcie (she/her)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Bots: Does the author really believe these sites aren’t capable of detecting bots? I’m sure some slip through, but if not traffic were included in general, then Linux would be at a 90% share or higher. They just consume way more page traffic than a human ever could.

      Only other possibility I can think of is llms made botting for small operators more accessible. Still leads to a lot more people running linux

  • nyan@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    Okay, so did they account for the bots that claim to be Windows PCs? (I’ll bet there are still some running around that identify themselves as IE 6, although those may finally no longer be the majority of all bots.)

  • novafunc@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Overall probably closer to the truth.

    I wish people didn’t obsess over these large numbers as much. Like when Linux suddenly hit 5% on Steam when that was clearly just an outlier and was destined to fall right back down.

    • it_depends_man@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The only interesting thing about the numbers is that eventually, people outside the tech bubble will pick up on it and think about seeing what the fuss is about and if it’s a solution for them and then maybe also switching.

      In that sense: I “heard” that the number is 20% actually. Windows is so over. It’s true. Pass it on.

    • BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Honestly it seems like they more or less identified all of the former unidentified users, and it turns out the vast vast majority of which are on unix based systems.

      If this goes right down again, I’d imagine the unidentified users to go up - But would be a decent indication for a lot of traffic being scrapers

      • novafunc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Something strange with the March 2026 results was that it had two new distro entries, “0 64 bit” at 17.60% and “64 bit” at 8%. In April, one of those entries disappeared and the other’s share dropped significantly. In May, both were gone entirely and Linux was back to a more reasonable marketshare of 4%.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Because these numbers experience wild fluctuations on a regular basis. Does it make sense to you that people are just joining and quitting Windows by the masses simultaneously?

      • chgxvjh [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        There was nothing that would have explained a more than doubling of Linux desktop market share.

        It was not that difficult to come up with a more likely explanations and some people where quick to mention AI crawlers/agents, which did actually explode in numbers.