• GodlessCommie@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          4 days ago

          Bernie Sanders co-opting, then bastardizing, that word harms actual socialism. Sanders is opportunistic garbage

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I mean democratic socialists are a thing and that’s basically what they look like. I’m not any happier about it than you are.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Democratic socialists are reformists, and reformism cannot actually implement socialism. In practice, demsocs are therefore socdems.

              • robear@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                cannot actually implement socialism

                Nobody has actually implemented socialism.

                So I guess the correct statement is “reformists haven’t yet implemented socialism but they might”.

            • Maeve@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              They’re not socialists. I can call myself “billionaire,” bit it doesn’t make me one.

            • GodlessCommie@lemmy.worldOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              4 days ago

              DEMSOCS are not socialist, the want to work within the confines of capitalism and preserve its exploitation

              • nandeEbisu@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                3 days ago

                I’m no political scholar, but I would rather have some improvements by people trying to make incremental progress within the existing framework than no improvement by purists.

                I also am skeptical of anyone claiming a policy or political approach is inherently better and will produce positive outcomes purely on theory alone. Theory is a great guide for policies but without small scale roll outs where outcomes are measured it’s all just ivory tower navel gazing.

                Also, I doubt any pure philosophy, like capitalism, communism, socialism or libertarianism will end up being the optimal solution. All are approximations of the complexity of real world sociopolitical and economic systems.

                • GodlessCommie@lemmy.worldOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Incrementalism only helps the oligarchy, voters assume it shifts to the left, it marches to the right.

                  What is it you wanted me to reconcile myself to? I was born here almost 60 years ago, I’m not gonna live another 60 years.

                  You always told me it takes time.

                  It’s taken my father’s time, my mother’s time. My uncle’s time. My brother’s and my sister’s time. My nieces’ and my nephews’ time.

                  How much time do you want? For your progress.

                  James Baldwin, 1982

                  50 years of liberal incrementalism/lessor evil and all you’ve gotten is a larger evil.

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  The dichotomy isn’t “some progress” vs. “Purity.” The point made by revolutionary socialists is that the capitalist system is incapable of reforming into socialism, and that socialism is a necessary step forward. Reforms only take the form of minor concessions, which can be taken away at will by the capitalist class, while the establishment of socialism is a semipermanent end to this issue (barring counterrevolution).

                  Marxists agree that pure theory with no practice is wrong. This is referred to as dogmatism, or “book worship.” Theory and practice are mutually reinforcing and sharpening. Theory gets tested by practice, which then tells us more about the world, which reshapes our theory and thus reshaping our practice.

                  Finally, the idea that a “mix” is the solution. I think the problem here is that you believe systems to be defined by purity, and not their principal aspects. Socialism is not a moralistic dogma, nor a legalistic decree. It’s a material system, which necessarily is propelled forward through the resolution of contradictions.

                  Private property, for example, de facto exists in socialist societies largely because of the underdevelopment of productive forces. The process of building towards higher levels of socialism therefore requires intense economic development. These systems are not “mixtures,” but different sectors within an overall socialist economy.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              That’s not how that works, though. “Socialist” has a more or less clear definition, and it’s hard to argue that Bernie satisfies that definition.

            • GodlessCommie@lemmy.worldOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              4 days ago

              He is not a socialist. He’s proven time and again he’s capitalist garbage copting words to keep people herded like cattle in the DNC.

      • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        I ask them “what do you not like about socialism” and then walk them to the capitalist equivalent. When they see the walls that late stage capitalism has put around their lives they get quiet. I like to think they are introspective but they are likely not happy with their bubble being burst.

        • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I don’t know where you live, but here conservatives have become so fanatical that absolutely nothing would convince them that socialism isn’t the actual devil.

          You’d have a better chance convincing the Pope that good doesn’t exist.

          • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            People in the deep red towns of the California Central Valley. People are scared of authoritarians and losing freedom. Hearing their rights are those freedoms is jolting because it’s easy to show what’s being lost and how the Constitution guarantees those freedoms. I’m not here to give them all the answers. I am here to make them as angry with the situation as I am.

        • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I like to think they are introspective but they are likely not happy with their bubble being burst

          They’re just waiting for that soothing moment when they can plop themselves down in front of Fox News or their favorite right-wing influencer and the world will make sense again. Whatever transformative victories you imagine yourself having, they’re incredibly short-lived.

  • Ilixtze@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    He forgot the part where the puppet dad takes 70% of his childrens allowance and starts giving the land water and copper of their house to another larger house down the block.

    One of the children is fine with this because at least it’s not stinking socialism anymore and pretends to vote for puppet dad.