• A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 minutes ago

    America needs to make its own KEI car standard. at least they wouldnt be as dangerous for pedestrians, or as disastrous for the environment as the fucking rolling city blocks we have now.

    Especially since we’re never gonna get a functional public transit system.

  • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The 5 square meters are no accurate display of the pavement covered by those cars, because they’re much longer than just their wheelbase.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      About double. American cars tend to be bigger so 5m long and 2m wide is probably a fair approximation. Hell, even in Europe the average car is probably something like 4,5m by 1,7m

  • antianarchist@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    American cars cover more pavement than they ever have

    Then goes ahead and shows a change from 48.9 to 51.8

    Whoever made those charts wanted to make the change look bad, no matter what.

    Where is the chart of the average heavy injuries per passenger? Or the average energy efficiency of engines?

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      injuries per passenger

      The fact that you phrased this so specifically to not mention the corresponding increased danger to other road users and pedestrians, suggests you’re a shill pushing industry talking points.

    • Jiral@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The graphs are terrible but come on, a 10% increase in weight in 10 years, doesn’t sound bad to you? Especially when the base value was anything but low to begin with? And an increased space consumption of 6% is a huge additional space consumption in absolute numbers, given the huge numbers of cars.

      • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The weight gain could theoretically be explained by the simple fact that electric vehicles are heavier than their combustion counterpart.

        Though I’m well aware these are american cars so probably just means more bigger pickup trucks that will never ever be used to actually pick things up.

        • Jiral@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Hardly, the EV adoption rate in the US is pretty poor and even if we ignore that, the share of EVs among existing vehicles on the road is way to small to be the dominating factor for the increase in weight. That said, yes, EVs will lead to an increase in weight, a necessary evil. However, that can be compensated by downscaling vehicles to actual needs. People are currently buying cars far larger than what they actually need for partly irrational and partly egoistic reasons (increasing threats to life and well being towards others in the hope to slightly decrease it towards oneself).

    • absquatulate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Yea this looks misleading as fuck. Weight graph starts at 3000lbs too. Also no mention of the cars polluting the nearby environment a lot less despite getting heavier. And why measure acceleration instead of measuring brake distance, or pedestrian survivability, or crashes per million miles etc.

      • Jiral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        “A lot less” is something I’d like to have a source for, especially as the switch to SUVs and trucks is done to a large part to evade the much stricter emission norms for officially classified “cars”. Emissions could be a lot lower if the SUV loophole for many of the car norms had not been invented.

  • benjirenji@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It’s an arms race. I prefer a bicycle, but am I really insane enough to ride it in between these tanks? My wife is afraid in traffic, she would never want to get a small car, just because of her safety concerns.

    The only thing stopping this madness is regulations.

  • Folstar@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Chart has clearly labeled x and y axis in addition to writing the numbers directly on the line.

    Trogs: this is misleading as fuck!

  • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    12 hours ago

    That’s vehicles classified as “light duty” — pickup trucks.

    All other vehicle classes are down in curb weight over that same period.

    • Jiral@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Yeah, show us the average numbers for all vehicles used for private personal transport then.

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        11 hours ago

        https://www.consumeraffairs.com/automotive/average-car-weight.html

        The average weight of passenger and commercial vehicles has varied over time. The pickup truck, which is America’s best-selling vehicle style, has bulked up considerably since the mid-1970s. As of 2024, the pickup truck has an average weight increase of 30% from 1975. Other vehicle styles, such as sedans and wagons, have slimmed down by 10%.

        You know, eventually you’ll need to learn how to use a search provider on your own.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          shield
          M
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          You know, eventually you’ll need to learn how to use a search provider on your own.

          Watch it. The only reason your comment didn’t get removed is that @Jiral found your link useful.

        • Jiral@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          Ah, ad hominem. Always nice.

          Your quote does not answer my question, but the source you linked to actually did.

          Average vehicle weight by year

          2014: 4060 pounds

          2024: 4419 pounds

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    One of the sad bits of this is that the move to EVs, while a positive in many ways, also makes our cars even heavier for the battery.

    • Hominine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Can you name the truck with four wheel drive?
      Smells like a steak and seats thirty-five.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        12 yards long, 2 lanes wide,

        65 tons of American Pride!

        She blinds everybody with her super high beams,

        She’s a squirrel crushing, deer smacking, driving machine!