• ulkesh@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    1 day ago

    Factoring in 35 years of inflation. A $0.50 mars bar in 1991 is $1.21 today. The cost of a Mars bar today is at least $1.50 USD (after converting from UK pounds) and that’s being generous.

    Companies are greedier than ever and there seems to be no stopping it (meaning because of the oligarchy in the US, Congress will never do a damn thing about it, and certainly the spoiled man-baby’s executive branch will do nothing about it), and no end in sight of it.

    Fuck them all.

    • Folstar@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      That’s the official inflation numbers, which are lies. It’s an open secret that in the 90s there was a political movement among the owners to artificially lower reported inflation (see: Boskin Commission for example) because it would boost the economy (on paper) while letting them absorb the gains.

      Underreporting by 1-2% a year doesn’t seem like much until you do it for several decades. Looking at actual inflation instead of the reported lie, that mars bar is closer to $2 today. Shrinkflation had to happen to keep the bigger con going. Most businesses will, of course, cheat the margins at every instance.

      TLDR; shrinkflation is a symptom, not the disease

    • theparadox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      1 day ago

      I would also be surprised if the cost of production, now using cheaper ingredients and far more automation, hadn’t also decreased.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I visited a chocolate confection assembly plant. The only things humans do now is random tasks like flip the random bar that for some reason fell odd onto conveyor or shift the skewed box on the pallet, or open the door for a shipment.

        The rest was automatic, from the pipes running chocolate throughout the plant to the final gluing and boxing.

        The costs are materials, and the factory operation cost, labour is almost nothing. So to increase profit they really can only cheapen or lesson the materials

        • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Shrinkflation implies a customer base that would either go elsewhere or without. I’m sure you’ve seen the efforts to eliminate all competition (establishing trusts, i.e. mega mergers) and weaseling into contracts like government that can’t be avoided.

          When your audience has no choice, you have no limits.

      • Airfried@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Oh absolutely. Productivity has increased drastically since the 90s but wages never kept up.

        • PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          Don’t say it in cop voice. Say:

          workers engineers and scientists made everything drastically more productive and the pedophiles stole all the gains. We keep letting them.

          • Airfried@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            22 hours ago

            We’re saying the same thing. The productivity surplus is getting stolen by the Epstein class. I’m not trying to sugarcoat anything.

            • PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              22 hours ago

              I know. You were trained to say it in a way that contains linguistic ‘outs’ for boot lickers and disattributes the harm. Read back my post and look at the formatting.

      • ulkesh@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I was 12, so I didn’t have 3 cents to rub together, let alone 30. I assumed it was similar to candy bars when I was in high school, which were about $0.50 at the time.

        • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I was only like 9, but I remember that shit. Lol.

          Least those were the prices here in the Midwest. Thirtyish cent candy bars, 25 cent bags of small chips, 35 cent cans of coca cola, 59 cents for a 20 ounce. If hamburger was a dollar a pound, it’s because it wasn’t on sale that week.

    • PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      We’ve had the technology to stop this since 1791. Arguments about maturity could be made that put an industrial version as late as 1917.

      That’s still over a century ago.