President Trump continues to say that Iran wants to make a deal to end the war and that the U.S. has control over the Strait of Hormuz. Meanwhile, the president downplayed concerns about the conditions aboard the USS Lincoln. MS NOW Senior National Security Reporter David Rohde and New York Times Chief White House Correspondent Peter Baker join Stephanie Ruhle with more details and analysis.



TL;DR: Of course he did. The next base to supply them is 2,200 miles away. They fucked up super bad again.
As a sidenote: reading this really made me miss the Oxford comma
Even more fun, this sentence is grammatically vague [I removed the end clause, because it’s irrelevant to this point and adds another comma]:
That could be an Oxford comma, but it’s probably not. I assume the “calling…misrepresented“ clause qualifies the first point and the second comma is because they’ve ended a quote.
See, they could’ve reworded it for the sake of clarity, but no… they’re just lazy. Not to mention that the responsibility for published articles like this don’t just fall on the writer; there are editors who review this as well. At least three sets of eyes looked over this, and they all decided that this was the best version.
Sometimes I wonder if crap like this gets published just to prove that it wasn’t generated by AI.
The first thing I thought after skimming the numbered headings was that it was AI generated
I’m legitimately surprised that Trump hasn’t gotten around to ordering the British to rename that via a long nonsensical Truth Social rant.
Minutes away to a conservative pundit complain that the resupply base name is Hispanic instead of an Union general and Trump forcing everyone to change the name
FTFY
Yeah, that was I intended to write but got it wrong
I’ve also been drinking 🥃
In all fairness, you can’t let your enemy know how badly you’re damaged. And considering this administration sees everybody as their enemy, might as well keep lying.
In all fairness, the enemy knows precisely what they’ve done and why. They know the damage they caused.
They’ve been highly effective with precision strikes that crippled logistics with intent, by choice.
Their generals are better than ours. The pedophile clowns fired our generals, reorganized leadership and we’re getting our ass handed to us.
The rot in the US military leadership started long before this president. Nevermind the existing rot that comes with the better part of a trillion dollars showering (yes, it’s a golden shower,) on the arms contractors for a moment.
Bush in his invasion if Iraq saw half the generals in the US be forced out, as they wouldn’t sign on to a flawed doomed to fail invasion plan.
Their generals are literate, sober at least an hour a day, don’t constantly run war games where they’re penalized for winning as red team, and not doing the job for five years so they can retire to a Grumman sinecure. I bet they aren’t brain rotted by chatbots and yes-men either.
I am convinced that I would out-general any current american general in an actual conflict. I don’t even remember the branches of the military. Barracks factory starport?