I remember watching The Hurt Locker (starring Jeremy Renner), the movie is meant to depict the Iraq War in 2004 but for some reason there’s a scene where an iPod Touch (releases in 2007), XBOX 360 (releases in 2005) and Gears of War (releases in 2006) present in the barracks even though these did not exist yet. Another anachronism from this movie is when a American soldier spots an Iraqi recording him ready on uploading the footage via YouTube (the website didn’t exist yet until 2005 when the story is set in 2004).

  • Eq0@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2日前

    Something that constantly grinds my gears is (main) characters being anti-slavery while the slave trade is up and running in the historical context. I assure you: most people were pro-slave or didn’t care. Being anti-slavery was an extreme political opinion and wouldn’t be considered small talk.

    • NightOps@nord.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2日前

      That reminds me of a war movie I’ve watched, when Josh Hartnett’s character said “I think WWII has just started” during the attack on Pearl Harbor. (That line is historically inaccurate).

      In reality, people would just consider it the “war” (referring to the European theater) or “Jap invasion of America” marking the US entry into the conflict (the term WWII was not coined yet until after).

        • Anchorxiety@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          2日前

          I would pay good money to see that line uttered in a movie about the incident. Or just have characters constantly state the obvious like the audience had never heard of WW1 before.

          "Gentlemen, Germany has invaded France. By God, this could become a multi year war of attrition and thousands could die!”

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2日前

        My kid’s second grade class did a short version of All Quiet on the Western Front that bizarrely included the line

        World War One has begun!

      • Eq0@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2日前

        Hilarious talking about WWII before the end of the conflict! At the time, WWI was called “the Great War”, surely not “part I” of anything

        • NightOps@nord.pubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2日前

          There’s another anachronism from that movie around 34 minutes in (during the scene where the nurses are on a transport ship heading for the hospital) as the movie is meant to be portraying 1941: you can literally see the USS Arizona memorial in the background as pictured and circled below:
          hGXgAE8SiDqgAn9.png

          It’s a nitpicky detail that made it on the final cut, since that wasn’t built until 1962 (way after the war!).

          • wjrii@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2日前

            I understand that the movie is quite awful, and I haven’t seen it. Is this shot worse in motion, or did they consistently try to hide it with the handrails? If the latter, it’s not really all that bad for on-location shot.

    • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2日前

      Highly context dependent, I guess, but the South seceded just because Lincoln was elected, even though he explicitly said he wasn’t going to end slavery, so enough people must have been talking about it to spook the slavers.

      ?

      • Eq0@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2日前

        Yeah, in that context it would make sense, I’m mostly talking about media where it’s just dropped in to show the good morals of the character, while having no consequences of meaning outside of that

        • NABDad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1日前

          Like in The Patriot when the British officer confronting Mel Gibson tells him his slaves will be seized, but then we find out he just has a bunch of free blacks who work for him because he’s such a damn nice guy.

          This despite him being a wealthy farmer in South Carolina at a time when it was essentially impossible that he wouldn’t have owned slaves.

          The character was most heavily inspired by Francis Marion

        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2日前

          Yeah, but that’s kind of just how people are. I bitch about stuff all the time, but I don’t do shit about any of it.

          The type of person who would go to Kansas or Spain is exceedingly rare.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2日前

      The way I analogize to abolitionism in the US c. 1800 is to ask how society feels about veganism today. Not as a strict moral equivalence but for the level of ambivalence, mockery, and outright disdain toward freeing a group society broadly considers chattel and with so much overlap in the arguments. “It’s better for them; they’re better-cared-for here.” “Those abusive owners aren’t the majority [somehow].” “My uncle owns an ethical farm.” “The economy depends on it.” “This is the natural order.” “Might makes right.” “Where would they all go if we magically freed them all right now immediately?” Shit, one of the few I see nowadays without a direct analog to back then is “plants feel pain”, which I guess would’ve been about as analogously stupid as “industrial machinery feels pain too!”

      This is going to piss some people off; fine, good even, that the point should be reinforced.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2日前

      This is one of the things that makes me fucking adore the Temeraire series: the protagonist has a father who is staunchly abolitionist and yet the protagonist himself doesn’t really think about it at all, until quite a bit later in the series when he starts realizing that slavery isn’t just some theoretical thing in “the colonies”.

      Meanwhile the dragon protagonist goes “um, isn’t that absolutely horrifying? am i missing something here??” when he learns about the existence of slavery, and this is absolutely pivotal to a lot of the plot in the later books!