• DigDoug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Commies gotta pump those numbers up if they want to come even close to capitalism’s death toll.

  • Tiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    My favorite is when they try to spin any communist leader as a good guy. Stalin in particular.

        • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          The data you’re citing would falsely indicate closer to 100mil every 10 years. Started a tally in 1990, its 2026 and it included millions of pre 90s deaths. Now whose inflating😉. The 420 million figure isn’t a measured death toll caused by capitalism. About 90% comes from deaths associated with hunger and inadequate healthcare, and the site makes the additional causal assumption that those deaths are attributable to capitalism. Show me the counterfactual proving those people would have survived under a non-capitalist system. Especially when considering the billions of dollars capitalist countries give in aid internationally and domestically. Also, global child mortality has fallen massively during the same period the site is counting these deaths as capitalism’s toll. The under-five mortality rate fell about 60% from 1990 to 2024, while the site attributes millions of ongoing deaths to capitalism.

          • 5318008@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Show me the counterfactual proving those people would have survived under a non-capitalist system.

            Are you going to apply the same standard to your original claim? How many of the alleged 200 million would have survived under a non-communist system?

            Data’s messy… I get it. The actual mechanics of tallying all of this don’t matter quite as much as applying those rules consistently. It would be a bit unreasonable for you to ask for a counterfactual tally of deaths under capitalism if you’re unable to provide one for deaths under communism.

          • joecitizen@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Uh decreases in child mortality is a result from non-profit, state-driven public health initiatives and mass vaccination campaigns, publicly funded sanitation, and universal health protocols rather than market driven incentives. Credit belongs to public infrastructure, not private market distribution. You can thank socialism for this.

          • macniel@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            About 90% comes from deaths associated with hunger and inadequate healthcare, and the site makes the additional causal assumption that those deaths are attributable to capitalism

            Ah the good ol tactic of “these people didn’t die due to covid, but they died while having covid.”

  • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Two hundred million? They managed to double their kill count since 2000? Impressive, especially considering the lack of invading Nazis to mow down en masse for easy numbers.

      • richardwallass@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        “the claims that Courtois made in the book’s introduction were not even accepted by all of his own contributors.”

        The figure encompasses the number of Vietnamese casualties resulting from armed conflict with the US.

        • Smif_N_Lenin@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          As the historian Ronald Aronson pointed out, even if Margolin did not cite the figure of one million victims of Vietnamese Communism invented by Courtois in the introduction, at no point in his chapter on Communism in Asia did he mention that the US intervention in Vietnam had cost, according to some estimates, up to three million lives.

      • macniel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Which is a bare minimum to treating the symptoms of capitalism. So that means nothing, while the world fucking burns due to to insatiable wealth pisser.

        • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          What would work better on a 8 billion multinational people scale? While still affording individual national cultures and freedom of expression.

    • Pudutr0n@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      7 hours ago

      capitalism being a system that promotes the accumulation of wealth / power by few to exert over many? So like… nature? Yeah, that would be everyone.

      Everyone that has ever died ever is due to capitalism. :)

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Capitalism as a mode of production is only a few hundred years old. It’s essentially a mode of production where private ownership is the principal aspect of the economy, and capital owners control the state. Before capitalism was feudalism, and before feudalism came slave societies, and before those came tribal communalism.

        Human nature is incredibly malleable and depends most upon how we produce and distribute, how we live and how our environment shapes us.

          • Wrufieotnak@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Capitalism is the private ownership of the means of production.

            There are special subdivisions with certain extra features, but the bare bones definition is just that.

            • Pudutr0n@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Isn’t private ownership kind of an extension of territorialism which is present in many species? Makes you think, huh?

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 hours ago

                No? Private ownership began to dominate society after feudalism. Turtles aren’t compelling others to labor for them through capital ownership.

              • Wrufieotnak@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                5 hours ago

                No, not really.

                Because if you do think about it, you would realize that a wide variety of species shows a wide variety of different behaviours. Which in turn means that all these opposing ways of behaviour are indeed natural, but not necessary natural for humans, as they are contradictory to each other. Or if you want to follow your proposed line of thought to the logical end, I await your proof of human males attaching to the much bigger female and atrophying to a simple ball of sacks for insemination as angler fishes are proven to do.

                Or to make the point even more direct: the whole concept of laws to give or take ownership is in itself so counter to all other animals behaviour that it is ludicrous to try and argue any part of that is in any kind of way natural. Or by definition of ‘humans as animals’ would mean any political system we adopt is natural by design.

                • Pudutr0n@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Or by definition of ‘humans as animals’ would mean any political system we adopt is natural by design.

                  Took you long enough

    • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Communism has never existed. Pretty sure anyone who isn’t extremely far left is a nazi anyway. So we need to nail down terminology first.