• artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Aaron was not charged with scraping public servers, he was charged with unauthorized access. He “hacked” the server. Meta just scraped publicly accessible information.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’m on Aaron’s side, but didn’t he break into a network closet and patch directly into their servers?

        It’s splitting hairs but the law treats breaking and entering very differently than remote access. When I went to school, I had a job on campus but I’m sure the University would have considered it illegal if I broke into the utility closet of the building I worked in.

    • John Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      But he did have access via university. Besides, my understanding is he was scraping research journals, many of which would not have been possible without grants from tax dollars. Meaning the mere fact that the research is publicly funded means the journals should also be public.But they didn’t even prove he distributed them. For all we know, he was planning to have an AI use them for training and apparently that isn’t a problem.

      You do realize as well that almost every site you visit makes API requests. And you can then use the same API to request other data directly. And the difference between “public” and unauthorized access often comes down to whether you used the same API that your browser would call, but instead decided to make other calls to it directly.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        but instead decided to make other calls to it directly.

        Like with command line tools? But that’d be hacking! Egads!

        Is it a B&E if the door is wide open…or would that just be an ‘E’?

        If you let your neighbor walk in to your house as he pleases…can you get mad at him if he walks in like Cosmo Kramer while you’re shagging your wife? Assuming you’re not into that, of course.

        What if he had noble intents…like he heard the moans and thought you were at work and he was about to break up an affair or stop a rape or have some leftovers?

    • DillDough@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Bruh, can you lick metas boots any harder? There’s so many examples of them using unauthorized access even long before llm’s were a thing…but even if that wasn’t the case, they just fucking bragged about their “ai” hacking other companies. Stop spreading lies for the billionaires, it’s pathetic.

      • Rimu@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Take it easy. artyom might just be mistaken you don’t need to turn it into a class war.

        • DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          At this point it already has been turned into a class war. They get away with so many crimes and just a slap on the wrist. If an individual does it life sentences. Almost like the laws are made to be broken by the rich.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I am not “licking boots”, I am discussing facts. And I’m gonna keep doing it.

        There’s so many examples of them using unauthorized access even long before llm’s were a thing

        Sure, there’s an endless list of awful things they’ve done, but that’s not what’s being discussed here.