Arch is different…

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve yet to have one of my windows systems brick itself. Several of my Linux systems have.

      • dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Same, at-least everything past Windows Vista era of operating systems. I guess Microsoft has the resources to test and deploy to most types of hardware configurations so the chances of getting a borked update is rarer compared to other OS’s like Arch and Mint which have a smaller user base but more diverse hardware configurations.

      • toddestan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I haven’t had a Windows install completely brick itself, but I have seen Windows go into a try to update->update fails->rollback->updates are available->tries to update again… etc. infinite loop.

        It’s been a while since I’ve had a Linux system brick that wasn’t me doing something stupid, though I’ve gotten a lot better at handling the occasional minor hiccup.

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It’s a problem regardless of what OS it happens to. I’ve personally/professionally found it much more frequent that an update breaks something on linux vs. windows, but it’s also much easier to fix those issues & they’re rarely the kind of critical failure you get with a M$ OS.

      (and if you truly crave stability, Debian is always happy to welcome you back into it’s big soft embrace)