SYAC: no pictures of the actual vehicle in this article, just stock images of Flock cameras. How incompetent of a journalist do you have to be to fail to include a picture of the thing your article is about?
Here is an article that actually shows the wrap on the car:
https://www.techspot.com/news/113418-cybersecurity-researcher-covered-toyota-ai-generated-pattern-confuse.htmlIt looks like this:
And here is a link to the mentioned Kickstarter campaign, which the Yahoo article also fails to provide:
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/norecognition/norecognition-ai-adversarial-clothing/descriptionThe campaign doesn’t mention the car at all, which is a little odd. You’d think they’d be using the media attention.
I also want to share a link to a previous post about this project:
https://piefed.social/c/privacy@lemmy.world/p/2288321/anti-flock-anti-ring-ai-adversarial-clothing-demo-d-blackhat-defconMy opinion is still the same as in that discussion - I don’t think a static pattern is going to be effective for very long.
Is the word “Donut” kryptonite to Flock?
Donut Media was the sponsor for the project.
They’ll call it Car Camouflage and tell MAGA it’s for terrorists or something I bet
