• AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Did those actually provide any sort of social outlet?

      That’s similar to the reason my company gives for having to be in the office but I work on the computer and go home. The only people I interact with are my remote peers

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Nationalizing dating sites.

    These sites work great to match people when corpos aren’t allowed to fuck with the algorithms

  • FireAtWill@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The reason there were mountain men in the old days is that they appreciated nature and they didn’t feel alone though they often were. It’s not that hard to rekindle that feeling you only have to work at it a little. I was taking walks in the woods back when I was in grade school and I seldom feel alone though it’s harder to feel like that in a city.

  • kepix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    a government dating app that has no algorythm, no payment, punishes mass scrollers, and has a ton of admins who actually ban the idiots out. we have the technology, but its all enshitificated.

    • steeznson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      There are at least 2 open source dating apps that I’ve seen, although one of them has 4chan branding. Not sure about the other.

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      This would work approximately as well as all the current apps. The people you want to date are either already in relationships, date without using the apps, aren’t dating right now, or simply don’t want to date you because you aren’t their type or aren’t good enough for them. The idea that the evil corporations know exactly who your perfect match is and are keeping them from you is a fantasy. The fact is, dating apps don’t work for most people because most people don’t put the effort in to present themselves well and put themselves out there.

  • Step 1

    • Demolish all housing - everyone is homeless now

    Step 2

    • Mandate that everyone design their own silly costume - this is all you’re allowed to wear

    Step 3

    • Legalize and subsidize all the fun drugs - everyone gets a weekly allowance of shrooms, ecstasy, etc

    Step 4

    • Loneliness is officially replaced with several other problems
  • bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Double the minimum wage and standardize a four day work week. People need more free time and resources in order to socialize effectively.

    • snoons@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      Couple this with providing safe and comfortable community spaces and every things peachy.

      No, the local Starbucks/any place of business does not count.

      • fantoozie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        This is a big one for me. Decoupling social activities from consumerism so people can access human connection without implicit or explicit paywalls.

  • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    2 days ago

    More public transit and more public spaces. Transit that you don’t have to think about taking (because it’s safe, frequent, and cheap or free) takes you to new places or to familiar places more often, and lets you meet more people more often. And going outside and doing shit is just good for you, I’m sorry to report.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 days ago

      I agree. I think a big part of the issue is that going out to do things is just so expensive these days. There aren’t any “third places” for people anymore.

      • Nikls94@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        The neighboring village just built a smallish sk8erpark for the youth. Quite nice finally seeing kids outside again. When walking the dog I feel like I haven’t seen kids doing kids stuff since like forever

    • NorthWestWind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Doesn’t work. I live in Hong Kong, which has some of the world’s most efficient public transport systems. People don’t actually talk. They just look at their phones. A train cart can be full of people but no conversation.

      • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        Public transit isn’t for socializing, it’s for traveling. Public spaces like parks, libraries, squares, etc that don’t require payment to use are for socializing.

        • NorthWestWind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Oh I thought you meant socializing during transit, sorry. I forgot to consider in other places parks are not a maximum 15-minute walk away

  • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    For a lot of people in suburbia, the entire concept of indoor “third spaces” is mostly “pay to play” at the end of a drive. A big exception to this is/were shopping malls, but those aren’t always close by. To get to more a functional social fabric, we have to provide more convenient ways of interfacing with our neighbors that don’t always require money to change hands.

    Perhaps this is a predictably orange-pill response, but we need to change zoning in a big way. Each suburban development has the street plan and infrastructure to support small businesses and common spaces, walking-distance from everyone’s front door. All it takes is to allow small-scale commercial development in corners of these collections of tract-homes and, just like that, you can have something like a functional village. Beyond that, encouraging more development of community recreation space, both indoor and outdoor, would go a long way to provide a place for people to mingle.

    Edit: strip-malls don’t count. They’re often at the very edge of residential areas, and are tied up with way more capital than what I’m talking about. That’s why they’re made up of franchises, require ridiculous amounts of parking, and contribute to “stroads” and all the knock-on effects and hostile architecture that requires.

  • thezeesystem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    For starters, Ubi, and then expansive and free public transit for all and accessible for all including disabled people, more free places to just go and exist, no facism and more community. That’s just for the beginning though