• lnxtx (xe/xem/xyr)@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    25 days ago

    It is Birmingham in the UK, not Alabama - as was my first thought.

    I hate comparing pro-pedestrians improvements to a war.
    There is no causalities, nor losers.

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      25 days ago

      It’s (by English standards) a big city, so it has a substantial contingent of ricky-racer needledicks who drive at 60 on narrow residential streets. Let 'em whinge. I’d say that anyone caught driving over 30 mph over the speed limit in a populated area should have their vehicle crushed into a cube while they are filmed watching it. That’d be good evening entertainment.

    • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ@lemmy.vg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      25 days ago

      There is no causalities, nor losers.

      There are casualties, all the people injured or killed by car drivers.

      In terms of conflict, you need to understand the suburban car dependency model as exploitation of urban areas. Without this constant exploitation, suburbia would be abandoned (bailouts are a separate issue.)

    • ladicius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      25 days ago

      For me riding my bike sometimes feels like and is dodging death by cars.

      They are sniping with bullets that weigh tons.

    • vividspecter@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 days ago

      It’s the framing that anti-bike/transit types have been using since the 2010s. Supporters are adopting it to argue there should actually be a war on cars.