• Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    because you’re bending over backwards to frame someone abusing someone else in a legal system as being the victim.

    • velma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      She was the victim in the case of her husband recording her without her consent. And he’s the victim in the case of their marriage breaking because of infidelity.

      One wrong doesn’t justify another wrong.

      Let me ask you - how far do you think he should be allowed to break the law in order to deliver punishment to his wife by his own hand?

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        how far do you think he should be allowed to break the law in order to deliver punishment to his wife by his own hand?

        … This is the societal compromise, you get evidence that someone cheated on you instead of murdering them.

        • velma@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          I’m asking you how far do you think he should be allowed to break the law in order to deliver punishment to his wife for cheating?

          You really think murder is justified in the case of cheating?

          • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            no, I’m saying the alternative to men snapping and killing their partner is giving them a legal system where they can present evidence and get justice.

            • velma@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Men are capable of controlling their actions.

              Murdering your wife because she cheated isn’t the only other option to recording someone having sex without consent.

              • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                how far do you think he should be allowed to break the law in order to deliver punishment to his wife by his own hand?

                the reason we have a legal system based on evidence is to prevent people from doing drastic vigilantism

                Murdering your wife because she cheated isn’t the only other option to recording someone having sex without consent.

                thanks

                • velma@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  I’m saying the alternative to men snapping and killing their partner is giving them a legal system where they can present evidence and get justice.

                  Way to adjust your comment to present a different assertion. You presented a dichotomy: either men get to murder their wives or they can record them cheating to get justice.

                  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    6 hours ago

                    yeah, because that’s why those laws exist : to prevent people doing horrible vigilante justice