• heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    59 minutes ago

    I still rock NoScript. It helps avoid drive-bys and other silliness. It does take patience though so I get why not many like it.

  • m3t00🌎🇺🇦@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    firefox became bloated so switched to chrome because faster/better. back to firefox last year. too old to keep fighting ads. thinking off button will be next. yeah addons mostly work

      • anewfox@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        nobody ever seems to detail what kinda bloat they mean when they say that, i don’t think they actually thought about it that deeply. nobody complains about anything specific like XUL support, for example.

        • narinciye@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          In my experience, there was a period when Firefox crashed all over the place, especially under heavy load. Tabs shared the same process back then, one tab could take down whole the browser session when crashed. I vividly remember how it felt so silky when i switched to chrome. Now I am back to Firefox since 3 years. Firefox is the sexier now with all the shiny addons

      • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It was back before enshittification of the internet, when things were better. Was just big and clunky, chrome came along and ran very fast, until last few years, they swapped places.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    When will people switch away from Chrome to other browsers? I get it, Chrome sets the standards and it’s hard to switch away from them, but it’s necessary to ensure the survival of the Internet.

    • Crit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I doubt most people even know you can change it. Edge is the default browser on windows. Chromium. Chrome is the default browser on android (though I suppose Samsung has a custom browser and they’re the main android device people are buying)

  • Julio Eusebio@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The transition away from Manifest V2 is a good example of how changes made by major platforms can have a huge impact on developers and users. I’m curious to see how this affects privacy-focused and specialized browser extensions over the long term.

  • isekaihero@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I think I’ll be switching to librewolf at home. It can install mozilla extensions and comes with ublock origin baked in. Pulling a stunt like this is just going to drive people away from the Chrome environment. Corpos can’t help but shoot themselves in the foot.

    • MuskyLime@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Most people I know simply don’t care. They will use it because it’s convenient and they don’t care about the privacy dangers. I can’t comprehend it myself though. Drives me up the wall.

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        8 hours ago

        They will use it because it’s convenient

        Using web without ublock is amongst the most inconvenient things I’ve experienced

        • techt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I think most people who don’t know better just think that’s “the internet” and that it’s the same no matter how you access it. The whole concept of browsers and extensions is just not in the realm of concern.

      • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I’ve seen some shift among the tech illiterate in my immediate vicinity, but most are still in the “I got nothing to hide” category of clueless twits.

        • MuskyLime@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Funnily enough my two kids have expressed hatred of AI. It’s mainly people around my age or higher that can’t let any sort of convenience go even if shown the dangers.

          Otherwise I’m just “scaremongering”.

            • Hazor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              My 14yo hates the current AI but says most peers are using it and can’t understand how to write an essay or such without it.

              I think only some of the kids are alright. Many, if not most, are in trouble.

        • OnyxRex@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          The problem is that everyone’s internet experience is very different these days. Your friends might be boring and actually have nothing in their lives that need compartmentalized/obfuscated. It’s unlikely but not impossible.

          The easiest way to demonstrate the problem would be when they show you something on an unprotected device you note the ads and give them shit for it. Those ads are likely targeted, and so your jabs would be targeted and personal too. Then point out that those ads are tied to THEM. Just ask every time, “have you been looking at X? Gross dude.” It doesn’t matter what it is. It’s the point that they are uncomfortable with your guess and it’s an opening to explain that, yeah it’s not just those ads buddy.

  • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    company which makes most of it’s revenue from advertising fucks with their browser’s ability to remove ads. Go figure!

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      12 hours ago

      i am surprised it took this long, but i know that getting everybody using chromium, or at least webextensions, was part of the plan that had to exist first. and the path down mv3 started not long after both mozilla and microsoft were both roped-in.

  • Axolotl@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    This is gonna be so bad because now there is only uBlock origin lite and “uBlock”, if you couln’t guess: the 2nd one is a scam that google never tried to remove(it’s been up for some years IIRC) and i am sure that everyone will try to install this scam because they can’t find the original uBlock origin (and everyone just refers to uBlock origin as uBlock which makes it worse)

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      the 2nd one is a scam that google never tried to remove

      It’s a little more complicated. uBlock was the original name, gorhil handed it off when he felt the maintenance burden became too high. Then he forked it to make his own uBlock Origin version.

      At some point later uBlock was bought up by the AdBlock people, who in turn were later bought by the AdBlock Plus people.

      So it’s not a scam exactly, more like an inbred sideline of the royal family.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It’s a scam because it specifically goes out of its way to not block an ad, as long as that ad pays a bribe to them. It should be called uAd.

  • danielfm123@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Install Firefox with https://adnauseam.io/, it’s basically ublock origin but internally clicks on every add destroying your adds profile and damaging economics of adds and conversion.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Well, it anonymizes you by “faking” the tracking. I would hope it takes steps to sandbox the ads.

      • dellish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Step 2: install Privacy Badger

        And Facebook Container is another useful one.

        • Axolotl@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Don’t, privacy badge and adnauseam will interfere eachothers and as result you will get worst results, you are better off using a DNS level adblocker (eg: Pihole or NextDNS if you don’t/can’t self host) alongside uBlock/adnauseam

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            13 hours ago

            They overlap; Ublock does it through lists, and badger does it through heuristics.

            Running just badger, it can miss things, if you can use both, you get all the lists and heuristics, but they’re probalby not both necessary

            • mschae@discuss.mschae23.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              It’s best not to use multiple ad blockers at the same time. They’ll conflict with each other and you’ll be worse off. uBO alone is probably enough.

                • Taldan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  I’ve used them both for years and never noticed any sort of conflict, but I’ve heard that potential conflict mentioned several times with no clarification

    • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Just a crying shame Mozilla has turned into a commercial nightmare making them relatively poor custodians of the only free choice we have left.

      Mozilla needs to die so Firefox can live.

      The income stream from Firefox is plenty for a highly technical, deeply competent, widely dispersed team could work full time on the product using something like OpenCollective.

      Instead what we get is prime SF real estate offices, “competitive” SF salaries and a commercial organisation that seeks weird and increasingly desperate income streams to justify looking like “real company”.

      I want an actual non-profit governing Firefox.

      • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        It’s called the forks, dude.

        Also, hopefully the ladybug thing or whatever gets off the ground someday.

        Edit: Servo is the better project to follow.

        • vogi@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          I think you mean ladybird, right?
          Just FYI The core maintainer is very close to the alt right open source sphere.
          Rejecting inclusivity as he deems it as too political and just rubbing shoulders with really weird guys.

          https://drewdevault.com/blog/Cloudflare-and-fascists/
          https://kvibber.com/reviews/software/ladybird-inclusivity/

          There is servo though which is picking up speed lately, im following their rss for a while now.
          https://servo.org/
          The money behind is also a lot more public and the project is more open to people. originally developed internally at mozilla it is now in the hands of the linux foundation europe.

          • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Ah ty. I wasn’t keeping track of either project, but good to know servo’s the one to look out for instead.

          • diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            Netsurf hasn’t seen any love lately. It’s still being developed on git but no releases. Same with Dillo.

            Dillo rejects scripting. Makes perfect sense to me. It also rejects automatic redirects, which also makes sense but the web has already been established around that as given so it can’t pass the most passive anti-bot.

            The state of scripting support on Netsurf is uhm, quite interesting. Scripts can write to the page parse time (like a snowflake generator) but can’t do ANYTHING after the page loaded, EXCEPT text fields and text areas. And scripts can always read but not write checkbox state. There aren’t any button events, either, but if you check the state of a text field repeatedly you can do interactivity. What is also interesting is that the new way of finding elements (getElementById) is functional, but the old way (document.formName.elementName) ISN’T. So that means that basically nothing existing functions (apart from again, the snowflake generators from geocities). But you can do the old style text animations if you specifically program it to use the new method despite being old style shit. Netsurf also passes “GoAway” and the most basic setting of Anubis (the passive redirects).

            Both are good enough to browse “old Lemmy”, although I haven’t tried to login since my instance doesn’t have it and the owner ghosted me (hi @milan@discuss.tchncs.de).


            There’s also a half public domain half permissive (BSD) text mode browser, https://chawan.net/ . Extraordinarily good concept! However, it avoids some of the bloat by forcing bloat onto your terminal emulator and having it render images, and my terminal emulator does not bother itself with such tasks and emulates a terminal, so image heavy sites like Lemmy fucking suck on it. No, it cannot just weight different characters from some public domain font (spoiler: if converted, all of them by international conventions are public domain) by brightness and by individual pixel similarity to an actual image and then just display those. That would make too much sense. I have high hopes for it, though. Also, I find the keybinds really weird.

            I have not tested Chawan’s scripting support much at all, all I can say is that it’s certainly better than Netsurf. And that everything I’ve written in the worst fucking programming language ever for Netsurf (not released yet, very soon I hope) runs on Chawan. However, they are unusable since textboxes open your preferred editor. Makes perfect sense, a browser shouldn’t be a text editor. But like, that breaks my gimmick that makes it work with Netsurf, damn. Checkboxes can be written to, for once, tho no access key support. The JS is still not enough to login to Lemmy (the default bloated frontend).


            Let’s use Gemini.

        • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          15 hours ago

          But it isn’t really. The forks rely on the majority effort of Mozilla and they would never be able to maintain Firefox on their own.

          • Marn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            14 hours ago

            This this true but if Mozilla closed it doors tomorrow there would be enough support for a team to be built to maintain it. The market share is small compared to chrome but it’s still an enormous user base.