If expulsion becomes a credible threat, it is easier to negotiate a policy change by the respective offending country.
I find it anyways not very convincing what an abolishion of veto rights would achive in such cases. The individual member state can’t really be forced to implement a majority decision either, unless the other member states implement what practically boils down to an expulsion (or send occupying troops?).
If expulsion becomes a credible threat, it is easier to negotiate a policy change by the respective offending country.
I find it anyways not very convincing what an abolishion of veto rights would achive in such cases. The individual member state can’t really be forced to implement a majority decision either, unless the other member states implement what practically boils down to an expulsion (or send occupying troops?).