• DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Only partially. They could be implying that all humans, regardless of gender are to be sexualized by default and that’s a good thing. If that’s what they’re saying, then I agree with them wholeheartedly.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Remind us which parts of a human are sinful to acknowledge, and why more of those put women at a disadvantage again? It seems a little sexist.

        • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          It’s not a problem to acknowledge any body part or attraction to it. It’s weird to signal that ads not prioritizing showing off the boobies means they’re missing something (referring to the desexualizing comment).

          The actress has nice large breasts. Great, I like them too. AT&T didn’t rely on them to sell products, but instead decided to focus the viewer’s attention on their products and services. What’s wrong with that? It’s a mobile internet service, not Hooters.