• oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      If there is no guarantee that they can recover their investment, people will not invest to build homes anymore and their will be less or worse homes to live in.

      • sulfidedisburseangledafternoontipper@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I don’t see that as a bad thing. The thing you get for building a house is a house to live in. Even in our nightmarish housing paradigm, people volunteer for things like habitat for humanity to help their neighbors have a place to live. In a world where housing is not a financial investment and people can’t be unwillingly displaced, I would expect only more desire to build homes that people actually want to live in.

        My primary financial security lies in my home equity and I would happily end evictions even if it cost me all of it.

        • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Some people don’t have the capital or don’t want to spend the capital to build a house and need places to rent. How do we get those houses built? Massive state intervention? Not sure it will do better than a regulated market, but why not. Now where is the law for it that should be accompanying this potential collapse of private offering?