geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 2 months agoBad opticslemmy.mlimagemessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1430arrow-down118
arrow-up1412arrow-down1imageBad opticslemmy.mlgeneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square52fedilink
minus-squareWarl0k3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·edit-22 months agoSo instead of elaborating… you’re just going to meme? I mean sure go ahead, it just feels kinda, idk, pointless. ba-dum tss.
minus-squaregeneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down4·2 months agoWhat do numbers mean anyways?
minus-squareWarl0k3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·2 months agoThat’s what I’ve been repeatedly asking you.
minus-squaregeneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down4·2 months agoSeems to mean that he wasn’t favorable at all.
minus-squareWarl0k3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·edit-22 months agoWait hangon, is this all because you’re interpreting positive approval of a contentious political figure from 1/3 of a population as not popular?
minus-squaregeneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down5·2 months agoYou realize that the figure includes black people right?
minus-squareWarl0k3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down4·edit-22 months agoSo… do… they not count?
minus-squareAlcoholicorn@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down4·edit-22 months agoThe question is optics of the oppressor. When someone tells <oppressed minority> they need to be civil and quiet and unobtrusive so straight, white, cis males will support them, and cites King, they’re either wildly misinformed of history or siding with the oppressor.
minus-squaregeneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·1 month agoEven including black people MLK was factually overwhelmingly unpopular.
So instead of elaborating… you’re just going to meme? I mean sure go ahead, it just feels kinda, idk, pointless. ba-dum tss.
What do numbers mean anyways?
That’s what I’ve been repeatedly asking you.
Seems to mean that he wasn’t favorable at all.
Wait hangon, is this all because you’re interpreting positive approval of a contentious political figure from 1/3 of a population as not popular?
You realize that the figure includes black people right?
So… do… they not count?
The question is optics of the oppressor.
When someone tells <oppressed minority> they need to be civil and quiet and unobtrusive so straight, white, cis males will support them, and cites King, they’re either wildly misinformed of history or siding with the oppressor.
Even including black people MLK was factually overwhelmingly unpopular.
… Except with black people, right?